Algunos consejeros dijeron que el INE debe abordar la cuestión del voto electrónico desde una perspectiva más matizada no con argumentos tajantes.Algunos consejeros dijeron que el INE debe abordar la cuestión del voto electrónico desde una perspectiva más matizada no con argumentos tajantes.

Partidos recibirán hasta 147 millones de pesos de militantes en 2026

Pese a la negativa de algunos de sus integrantes, el Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE) confirmó que en estos momentos es inviable poner en marcha el voto electrónico a nivel nacional para las próximas elecciones “debido a que esta modalidad no está considerada en la normatividad aplicable”.

Tras presentar un Informe sobre la viabilidad para que las y los ciudadanos mexicanos residentes en territorio nacional emitan su voto en los próximos procesos electorales por Internet de forma similar a la que las personas mexicanas residentes en el extranjero ejercen su derecho al sufragio.

El INE anunció que se ha intensificado el análisis de la viabilidad del voto electrónico, particularmente del voto por Internet; no obstante, advirtió que es inviable la eventual implementación del voto por Internet en territorio nacional, ya que requiere condiciones normativas, operativas, registrales y tecnológicas que hoy no están plenamente configuradas.

Financiamiento privado

A su vez, el Consejo General del INE avaló los límites para el financiamiento privado a los partidos para el 2026.

El órgano electoral detalló que se permitirá a los partidos políticos nacionales que reciban hasta 147 millones 363,032 pesos, en dinero o en especie, por parte de su militancia y en aportaciones por parte de simpatizantes, en dinero o en especie, el límite será de 66 millones 97,872 pesos y 30 centavos.

Se indicó también que la aportación individual de simpatizantes no podrá superar los tres millones 304,893 pesos y 61 centavos en dinero o especie.

Market Opportunity
ELYSIA Logo
ELYSIA Price(EL)
$0.00208
$0.00208$0.00208
+1.21%
USD
ELYSIA (EL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt is preparing a list of projects to show potential investors in its promising “golden triangle” area, home to nearly half the Arab country’s gold deposits.
Share
Agbi2025/12/25 04:09
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58