ExchangeDEX+
Buy CryptoMarketsSpotFuturesGOLDEarnEvents
More
The post David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Unverified claims circulatingThe post David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Unverified claims circulating

David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus

Author: CoinPediaSource: CoinPedia
2026/02/02 20:50
Ripple XRP email controversy

The post David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Unverified claims circulating online are once again linking early crypto figures, old emails, and the long-running XRP story. At the centre of the discussion is an alleged email from July 31, 2014, said to have been sent by tech entrepreneur Austin Hill, which raised concerns about Ripple and Stellar, a project founded by Jed McCaleb, who also co-founded Ripple and XRP.

What the Alleged Email Says

According to online posts, the email was addressed to Joichi Ito and Jeffrey Epstein, with the subject line “Stellar isn’t so Stellar.” In it, Hill allegedly warned that it was harmful for the ecosystem to have investors “backing two horses in the same race,” referring to Ripple and Stellar competing for the same financial backers.

Commentators claim this points to early power struggles in crypto’s formative years, though there is no proof of wrongdoing by any of the parties involved.

Claims Around MIT and Funding

The narrative goes further, alleging that Epstein had financial ties to academic institutions such as MIT’s Media Lab, where blockchain research was conducted. Public records have previously confirmed that Epstein donated money to MIT. However, claims that this funding influenced crypto markets, projects, or regulators remain unproven.

Some online discussions also try to connect these past associations to the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple, filed in 2020, and to former SEC chair Gary Gensler, who previously taught blockchain-related courses at MIT. While allegations of conflicts of interest are being circulated, there is no evidence that the SEC’s case against Ripple was driven by these academic or personal links.

  • Also Read :
  •   XRP Price Holds Support After Selloff as On-Chain Data Shows Reduced Downside Risk
  •   ,

David Schwartz Responds

Reacting to the resurfaced claims, David Schwartz, Chief Technology Officer at Ripple, shared a cautious but pointed view:

What Is Fact and What Is Not

Experts stress that many of these stories rely heavily on speculation, coincidence, and unverified interpretations rather than confirmed facts. The Ripple vs SEC case has unfolded mainly through court filings and judicial rulings, not leaked emails or historical associations.

As of now, there is no official confirmation that the alleged 2014 email or the relationships being discussed had any influence on XRP, Bitcoin, or regulatory decisions. Analysts caution investors to separate documented facts from online theories, especially during volatile market conditions when such narratives tend to spread quickly.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

Could these claims affect investor confidence in Ripple or Stellar?

Speculative claims can temporarily influence sentiment, causing some investors to hesitate. However, long-term confidence typically relies on project fundamentals, regulatory clarity, and market performance rather than historical allegations.

Should investors worry about unverified crypto conspiracies?

Speculative stories can spread fast, especially in volatile markets, but confirmed facts should guide investment decisions.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Let insiders trade – Blockworks

Let insiders trade – Blockworks

The post Let insiders trade – Blockworks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from The Breakdown newsletter. To read more editions, subscribe ​​“The most valuable commodity I know of is information.” — Gordon Gekko, Wall Street Ten months ago, FBI agents raided Shayne Coplan’s Manhattan apartment, ostensibly in search of evidence that the prediction market he founded, Polymarket, had illegally allowed US residents to place bets on the US election. Two weeks ago, the CFTC gave Polymarket the green light to allow those very same US residents to place bets on whatever they like. This is quite the turn of events — and it’s not just about elections or politics. With its US government seal of approval in hand, Polymarket is reportedly raising capital at a valuation of $9 billion — a reflection of the growing belief that prediction markets will be used for much more than betting on elections once every four years. Instead, proponents say prediction markets can provide a real service to the world by providing it with better information about nearly everything. I think they might, too — but only if insiders are free to participate. Yesterday, for example, Polymarket announced new betting markets on company earnings reports, with a promise that it would improve the information that investors have to work with.  Instead of waiting three months to find out how a company is faring, investors could simply watch the odds on Polymarket.  If the probability of an earnings beat is rising, for example, investors would know at a glance that things are going well. But that will only happen if enough of the people betting actually know how things are going. Relying on the wisdom of crowds to magically discern how a business is doing won’t add much incremental knowledge to the world; everyone’s guesses are unlikely to average out to the truth. If…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:16
The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge

The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge

The post The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MANCHESTER, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 14: Gianluigi Donnarumma of Manchester City celebrates the second City goal during the Premier League match between Manchester City and Manchester United at Etihad Stadium on September 14, 2025 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images) Visionhaus/Getty Images For a goalkeeper who’d played an influential role in the club’s first-ever Champions League triumph, it was strange to see Gianluigi Donnarumma so easily discarded. Soccer is a brutal game, but the sudden, drastic demotion of the Italian from Paris Saint-Germain’s lineup for the UEFA Super Cup clash against Tottenham Hotspur before he was sold to Manchester City was shockingly brutal. Coach Luis Enrique isn’t a man who minces his words, so he was blunt when asked about the decision on social media. “I am supported by my club and we are trying to find the best solution,” he told a news conference. “It is a difficult decision. I only have praise for Donnarumma. He is one of the very best goalkeepers out there and an even better man. “But we were looking for a different profile. It’s very difficult to take these types of decisions.” The last line has really stuck, especially since it became clear that Manchester City was Donnarumma’s next destination. Pep Guardiola, under whom the Italian will be playing this season, is known for brutally axing goalkeepers he didn’t feel fit his profile. The most notorious was Joe Hart, who was jettisoned many years ago for very similar reasons to Enrique. So how can it be that the Catalan coach is turning once again to a so-called old-school keeper? Well, the truth, as so often the case, is not quite that simple. As Italian soccer expert James Horncastle pointed out in The Athletic, Enrique’s focus on needing a “different profile” is overblown. Lucas Chevalier,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:38
Wormhole’s W token enters ‘value accrual’ phase with strategic reserve

Wormhole’s W token enters ‘value accrual’ phase with strategic reserve

Wormhole has moved beyond its distribution phase, initiating a new strategy. By allocating on-chain and off-chain protocol revenue to a dedicated treasury, the cross-chain protocol is creating a direct link between its commercial success and the value of its native…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 03:05