Symfony 7.4 introduces var/share to separate local system cache from shared application data—solving cache inconsistency in Kubernetes without the NFS performanceSymfony 7.4 introduces var/share to separate local system cache from shared application data—solving cache inconsistency in Kubernetes without the NFS performance

Symfony 7.4’s Share Directory Solves the Cache Problem for Kubernetes Apps

The release of Symfony 7.4 marks a pivotal moment for PHP developers, particularly those of us architecting high-performance, cloud-native applications. While the changelog is packed with the usual array of developer experience (DX) improvements and performance tweaks, one feature stands out as a game-changer for infrastructure teams and backend leads alike: the Share Directory.

For years, we’ve wrestled with the “Cache Dilemma” in multi-server environments. We’ve written hacky scripts, managed complex NFS mounts and accepted performance penalties — all to keep our application state synchronized. With Symfony 7.4, the core team has finally addressed this architectural friction point head-on.

In this artice, we will explore the new var/share directory, understand the critical problem it solves and implement a robust, production-ready configuration using Symfony 7.4, Doctrine and Flysystem.

The “Cache Dilemma”: A History of Performance Bottlenecks

To appreciate the elegance of the Share Directory, we must first revisit the pain of the past. In a standard Symfony application, the var/cache directory has historically been the dumping ground for two very different types of data:

  1. System Cache: This includes the compiled service container, URL matching routes, optimized Twig templates and class maps. This data is immutable (or should be) after the cache:warmup phase. It is specific to the version of the code currently running.
  2. Application Cache: This includes your cache.app pool, API responses, serialized objects and potentially temporary file storage. This data is volatile and shared. If Server A caches a heavy database query, Server B should be able to read it.

The Problem in a Cluster

Imagine you are deploying a Symfony app to a Kubernetes cluster with 10 pods.

  1. Scenario A (Local Cache): You keep var/cache local to each pod. \n Result: The System Cache is fast (local SSD). However, the Application Cache is fragmented. If a user hits Pod 1, their data is cached there. If their next request hits Pod 2, the cache is missed and the database is hit again. Data consistency is lost.
  2. Scenario B (Shared Storage): You mount var/cache to a shared volume (NFS, EFS). \n Result: The Application Cache is consistent across all pods. Great! But now, every time Symfony needs to load a class or check a route (System Cache), it has to traverse the network to read from the shared storage. This introduces significant I/O latency, often slowing down response times by 10–20% simply due to filesystem overhead.

We were stuck choosing between consistency and performance.

Enter the Share Directory (var/share)

Symfony 7.4 introduces a dedicated architectural concept to solve this: the Share Directory.

This feature formally decouples the location of system-specific files from application-shared files.

  • var/cache: Remains the home for System Cache. It should stay local to the server (ephemeral storage in K8s terms). It requires no synchronization.
  • var/share: The new home for Application Data. This directory is designed to be mounted on shared storage (like NFS, AWS EFS, or a persistent volume).

This separation allows us to have the best of both worlds: blazing-fast, local system caches and a consistent, shared application state.

Implementation Guide

Let’s get our hands dirty. We will build a Symfony 7.4 application that leverages the Share Directory for three common use cases:

  1. Shared Application Cache
  2. Shared File Storage (Uploads)
  3. Shared SQLite Database (for simple state)

Prerequisites and Installation

Ensure you are running PHP 8.2 or higher and have the Symfony CLI installed.

symfony new my_app --webapp cd my_app composer require symfony/framework-bundle:^7.4

Basic Configuration

In a fresh Symfony 7.4 installation, the framework is already aware of this concept. Open your .env file. You will see a new environment variable:

# .env APP_SHARE_DIR=$APP_PROJECT_DIR/var/share

Under the hood, the Kernel class now implements a getShareDir() method. If you are upgrading an existing application, you might need to add this manually or rely on the default fallback (which points to the cache directory for backward compatibility).

To enforce this structure in an upgraded app, update your Kernel.php if necessary, or simply define the environment variable.

Configuring Shared Cache Pools

The most immediate win is moving your application cache to the shared directory. By default, Symfony’s file system cache adapter saves to var/cache/pools. We want to move this to var/share/pools.

Open config/packages/cache.yaml. We will configure the default app cache to use the new %kernel.share_dir% parameter.

# config/packages/cache.yaml framework: cache: # distinct_id helps avoid collisions if multiple apps share the same storage prefix_seed: 'my_app_%env(APP_ENV)%' # Default app cache app: cache.adapter.filesystem # System cache (stays in var/cache, FAST!) system: cache.adapter.system # Configure filesystem adapter to use the share directory default_redis_provider: 'redis://localhost' pools: # We explicitly tell the 'cache.app' pool to use the share directory cache.app: adapter: cache.adapter.filesystem provider: ~ # The 'directory' option is available for the filesystem adapter # We use the new container parameter default_lifetime: 3600 provider: 'cache.default_marshaller' services: # We need to configure the specific directory for the filesystem adapter # Since we can't easily pass the directory in the simplified YAML above for the main adapter, # we can define a custom adapter or rely on the global default if Symfony 7.4 automates it. # However, for explicit control, let's define a shared pool: cache.adapter.shared_filesystem: parent: 'cache.adapter.filesystem' tags: ['cache.pool'] arguments: $directory: '%kernel.share_dir%/pools' framework: cache: app: cache.adapter.shared_filesystem

In standard Symfony 7.4, the default filesystem adapter might still default to cachedir. By explicitly creating a service cache.adapter.sharedfilesystem pointing to %kernel.share_dir%/pools, we ensure that our application cache is stored in the correct location.

To verify this, clear your cache and warm it up.

php bin/console cache:clear php bin/console cache:pool:clear cache.app

Then, generate some cache entries (e.g., by visiting a page). Check the directory structure:

ls -la var/share/pools

You should see a folder structure created by the cache adapter.

Shared File Storage with Flysystem

Handling user uploads in a cluster is a classic use case for shared storage. We will use league/flysystem-bundle to map a storage adapter to var/share/storage.

Installation:

composer require league/flysystem-bundle

Configuration: Open config/packages/flysystem.yaml.

# config/packages/flysystem.yaml flysystem: storages: default.storage: adapter: 'local' options: # Use the new kernel parameter directory: '%kernel.share_dir%/storage'

Now, let’s create a service to handle file uploads using this storage. We will use PHP 8 Attributes for dependency injection.

namespace App\Service; use League\Flysystem\FilesystemOperator; use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Attribute\Target; use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\File\UploadedFile; class FileManager { public function __construct( #[Target('default.storage')] private readonly FilesystemOperator $storage ) {} public function uploadUserFile(UploadedFile $file, string $userId): string { $filename = sprintf('%s/%s.%s', $userId, uniqid(), $file->guessExtension()); $stream = fopen($file->getPathname(), 'r'); // Write to var/share/storage/... $this->storage->writeStream($filename, $stream); if (is_resource($stream)) { fclose($stream); } return $filename; } public function getFileContent(string $filename): string { return $this->storage->read($filename); } }

When you deploy this to Kubernetes, you will mount a Persistent Volume Claim (PVC) to /app/var/share. If Pod A uploads a file, it is written to the PVC. Pod B can immediately read that file via the same path, because they share the underlying storage volume.

Shared SQLite Database (The “Lite” Cluster)

While usually not recommended for heavy concurrent writes, using SQLite in var/share is a fantastic pattern for read-heavy, low-write data, or simple internal tooling dashboards that need to persist across deployments without a full MySQL/PostgreSQL setup.

Configuration: Open config/packages/doctrine.yaml.

doctrine: dbal: # Use the standard SQLite driver driver: 'pdo_sqlite' # Point the path to the share directory path: '%kernel.share_dir%/db/app.sqlite' charset: UTF8

Ensure the directory exists:

mkdir -p var/share/db

Now, when you run migrations:

php bin/console doctrine:migrations:migrate

The .sqlite file is created in the shared directory. All servers in your cluster will read from this single file.

Warning: SQLite over NFS (Network File System) can have locking issues. Ensure your shared storage solution supports file locking correctly (e.g., AWS EFS with appropriate mounting options), or reserve this for scenarios with very low write frequency.

DevOps: The Deployment Strategy

To fully utilize this feature, your deployment manifest (e.g., docker-compose.yml or Kubernetes deployment.yaml) needs to be updated.

Docker Compose Example

Here is how you simulate the production environment locally.

services: app_1: build: . environment: APP_SHARE_DIR: /app/var/share volumes: - shared_data:/app/var/share app_2: build: . environment: APP_SHARE_DIR: /app/var/share volumes: - shared_data:/app/var/share volumes: shared_data:

In this setup:

  1. System Cache (var/cache) is inside the container (fast, isolated).
  2. Shared Data (var/share) is a named volume shared between app1 and app2.

Kubernetes (K8s) Strategy

In Kubernetes, you would use a PersistentVolumeClaim.

apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: symfony-app spec: replicas: 3 template: spec: containers: - name: php image: my-symfony-app:7.4 env: - name: APP_SHARE_DIR value: "/var/www/html/var/share" volumeMounts: - mountPath: "/var/www/html/var/share" name: shared-storage volumes: - name: shared-storage persistentVolumeClaim: claimName: efs-pvc

Verification:

  1. Exec into Pod 1: kubectl exec -it symfony-app-pod-1 — bash
  2. Create a file: touch var/share/test.txt
  3. Exec into Pod 2: kubectl exec -it symfony-app-pod-2 — bash
  4. Check file: ls var/share/
  5. You should see test.txt.

Migration Guide: Upgrading to 7.4

If you are maintaining a legacy application, adopting the Share Directory requires a few careful steps.

  1. Update Composer: Update composer.json to allow symfony/*: 7.4.*. Run composer update “symfony/*”.
  2. Update .env: Add APPSHAREDIR to your .env and .env.test.
  3. Update .gitignore: You generally do not want to commit the contents of the share directory, but you might want to keep the gitkeep.
  4. Refactor Paths: Search your codebase for hardcoded references to kernel.cachedir or var/cache. If the code was using the cache directory to store data that should be persisted or shared (like generated PDF reports, temporary exports), change it to use %kernel.sharedir%.

Conclusion

Symfony 7.4’s Share Directory is more than just a new folder structure; it is a maturity signal. It acknowledges that modern PHP applications live in the cloud, across clusters and need to scale horizontally without fighting the framework.

By adopting var/share, you simplify your infrastructure configuration, improve the performance of your system caches and provide a clear, standardized location for your application’s state.

Ready to scale? Start by upgrading a non-critical microservice to Symfony 7.4 today. Implement the var/share directory, remove those complex NFS mounts for your system cache and watch your average response times drop.

Keep in touch! Did this article help you clarify your upgrade path? Follow me on [LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-mochalkin/]. Let’s build better software, together.

\

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02015
$0.02015$0.02015
-1.27%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shiba Inu Price Stalls Near Lows – What Could Matter in 2026 For SHIB To Takeoff?

Shiba Inu Price Stalls Near Lows – What Could Matter in 2026 For SHIB To Takeoff?

Shiba Inu has had a tough year, and its not hiding on the chart. TheCryptoBasic shared on X that the SHIB price has printed its first-ever weekly death cross in
Share
Coinstats2025/12/25 06:00
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40
Grayscale ETF Tracking XRP, Solana and Cardano to Hit Wall Street After SEC Pause

Grayscale ETF Tracking XRP, Solana and Cardano to Hit Wall Street After SEC Pause

The post Grayscale ETF Tracking XRP, Solana and Cardano to Hit Wall Street After SEC Pause appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief The SEC said that Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund conversion into an ETF is approved for listing and trading. The fund tracks the price of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, and Cardano. Other ETFs tracking XRP and Dogecoin began trading on Thursday. An exchange-traded fund from crypto asset manager Grayscale that tracks the price of XRP, Solana, and Cardano—along with Bitcoin and Ethereum—was primed for its debut on the New York Stock Exchange, following long-sought approval from the SEC.  In an order on Wednesday, the regulator permitted the listing and trading of Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund (GDLC), following an indefinite pause in July. The SEC meanwhile approved of generic listing standards for commodity-based products, paving the way for other crypto ETFs. A person familiar with the matter told Decrypt that GDLC is expected to begin trading on Friday. Unlike spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs that debuted in the U.S. last year, GDLC is modeled on an index tracking the five largest and most liquid digital assets. Bitcoin represents 72% of the fund’s weighting, while Ethereum makes up 17%, according to Grayscale’s website. XRP, Solana, and Cardano account for 5.6%, 4%, and 1% of the fund’s exposure, respectively.  “The Grayscale team is working expeditiously to bring the FIRST multi-crypto asset ETP to market,” CEO Peter Mintzberg said on X on Wednesday, thanking the SEC for its “unmatched efforts in bringing the regulatory clarity our industry deserves.” Decrypt reached out to Grayscale for comment but did not immediately receive a response. Meanwhile, Dogecoin and XRP ETFs from Rex Shares and Osprey funds began trading on Thursday. The funds are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, a distinct set of rules compared to the process most asset managers have sought approval for crypto-focused products under. Not long ago,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 04:19