A fresh debate has started in the crypto world after a viral claim about Bitcoin’s future cycles. The statement came from YoungHoon Kim, who holds a Guinness-recognisedA fresh debate has started in the crypto world after a viral claim about Bitcoin’s future cycles. The statement came from YoungHoon Kim, who holds a Guinness-recognised

Bitcoin Supercycle Debate Grows Across Crypto Markets In 2026

A fresh debate has started in the crypto world after a viral claim about Bitcoin’s future cycles. The statement came from YoungHoon Kim, who holds a Guinness-recognised IQ score of 276. He said that Bitcoin’s traditional four-year cycle is dead and that the market is now entering a decade-long supercycle. The claim spread across social media fast and called for strong reactions.

What Is the 4-Year Bitcoin Cycle?

For years, many investors have believed Bitcoin moves in four-year cycles. These cycles usually line up with Bitcoin’s halving events. Halvings reduce the supply of new Bitcoin and often lead to bull markets.

This pattern appeared after major peaks in 2013, 2017 and 2021, with another surge following the 2024 halving. Because of this history, the four-year model became a key tool for traders and analysts. However, some people now think that this pattern may be changing.

The Case for a Bitcoin Supercycle

Kim’s statement supports the idea of a supercycle, where Bitcoin grows over many years with fewer deep crashes. Supporters say that this shift comes from institutional adoption, ETFs and wider acceptance of Bitcoin as a financial asset.

A Fidelity report from December 2025 also added to this view. It suggested that strong ETF inflows could support long-term price growth with smaller drawdowns than in past cycles. In this view, Bitcoin may behave more like a mature asset instead of a speculative one.

Why Many Analysts Remain Cautious

Despite all the excitement, a lot of analysts send out warnings. Bitcoin has broken expectations before, but it has also returned to familiar patterns again and again. Moreover, data from the past still shows sharp corrections and periods of high volatility. These features remain part of Bitcoin’s nature, even as adoption grows.

More importantly, no peer-reviewed research confirms that a supercycle is guaranteed. While factors like global liquidity and clearer regulation help Bitcoin, they do not remove risk.

So, Is the 4-Year Cycle Really Dead?

For now, the answer is still unclear. Bitcoin may change, but it rarely moves in a straight line. The market now sits between two ideas, which are old cycles and a possible new structure. What is clear is that Bitcoin is changing, and institutional money, ETFs and regulation are playing a bigger part now. 

Whether this leads to a true supercycle or is just a longer version of past cycles is still an open question. As always in crypto, certainty is not always guaranteed, and patience matters most.

The post Bitcoin Supercycle Debate Grows Across Crypto Markets In 2026 appeared first on Coinfomania.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

qLabs Fires First Shot in Quantum Crypto Race — Can Coinbase Catch Up?

qLabs Fires First Shot in Quantum Crypto Race — Can Coinbase Catch Up?

The rapid progress of quantum computing is forcing the cryptocurrency industry to confront the problem that has long been treated as theoretical. Blockchains th
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/30 22:53
The Anatomy of a Self-Made Billionaire’s Mindset: How Gurhan Kiziloz Reached a $1.7B Net Worth

The Anatomy of a Self-Made Billionaire’s Mindset: How Gurhan Kiziloz Reached a $1.7B Net Worth

There are many paths to wealth in the modern economy, but the one Gurhan Kiziloz took stands out for a simple reason: he built everything himself. By 2026, the
Share
Coinstats2026/01/30 23:07
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28