The post Will the machine economy fuel the next Ethereum boom? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum is positioning its base layer to coordinate autonomous agents, a move that puts machine, to machine commerce on a direct path to on-chain settlement in the coming year. This month, the Ethereum Foundation formed a dedicated dAI Team with a remit to advance agent identity, trust, and payments, including support for ERC-8004, a draft standard for agent credentials and verification that would anchor identity and attestations at the protocol level. The initiative frames Ethereum as a settlement and coordination layer for agent economies, with censorship resistance and open access as core design goals, while community drafts around ERC-8004 outline how on-chain identity and trust could allow automated systems to negotiate, post bonds, and execute escrow without custodial intermediaries. The near-term deliverable is research and standards progress that can be adopted by wallets, middleware, and dApps in 2026, creating a shared trust substrate for agentic applications. Token flows already reflect an AI tilt in crypto markets. AI-focused tokens such as Bittensor, Fetch.ai (ASI), Internet Computer, and Render have maintained on-chain activity and relative price stability through Q3, outpacing broader altcoins during the recent market drawdown. Koinly’s market roundups point to continued demand for decentralized compute, inference, and agent frameworks, while ecosystem reports show ICP’s push for native app hosting and Render’s GPU marketplace drawing steady usage from AI workloads. Per Token Metrics, DeFi total value locked has rebounded from roughly $72 billion in early 2025 toward the $100 billion area, with new AI-native DeFi rails such as Blackhole DEX on Avalanche, Sahara AI, and Moby AI contributing to volumes and fee generation that persisted through volatility. Token Metrics places this in a broader rotation toward automated liquidity and agent execution that can operate across chains via messaging and omnichain abstractions. The payments stack is converging on agent use cases at… The post Will the machine economy fuel the next Ethereum boom? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum is positioning its base layer to coordinate autonomous agents, a move that puts machine, to machine commerce on a direct path to on-chain settlement in the coming year. This month, the Ethereum Foundation formed a dedicated dAI Team with a remit to advance agent identity, trust, and payments, including support for ERC-8004, a draft standard for agent credentials and verification that would anchor identity and attestations at the protocol level. The initiative frames Ethereum as a settlement and coordination layer for agent economies, with censorship resistance and open access as core design goals, while community drafts around ERC-8004 outline how on-chain identity and trust could allow automated systems to negotiate, post bonds, and execute escrow without custodial intermediaries. The near-term deliverable is research and standards progress that can be adopted by wallets, middleware, and dApps in 2026, creating a shared trust substrate for agentic applications. Token flows already reflect an AI tilt in crypto markets. AI-focused tokens such as Bittensor, Fetch.ai (ASI), Internet Computer, and Render have maintained on-chain activity and relative price stability through Q3, outpacing broader altcoins during the recent market drawdown. Koinly’s market roundups point to continued demand for decentralized compute, inference, and agent frameworks, while ecosystem reports show ICP’s push for native app hosting and Render’s GPU marketplace drawing steady usage from AI workloads. Per Token Metrics, DeFi total value locked has rebounded from roughly $72 billion in early 2025 toward the $100 billion area, with new AI-native DeFi rails such as Blackhole DEX on Avalanche, Sahara AI, and Moby AI contributing to volumes and fee generation that persisted through volatility. Token Metrics places this in a broader rotation toward automated liquidity and agent execution that can operate across chains via messaging and omnichain abstractions. The payments stack is converging on agent use cases at…

Will the machine economy fuel the next Ethereum boom?

Ethereum is positioning its base layer to coordinate autonomous agents, a move that puts machine, to machine commerce on a direct path to on-chain settlement in the coming year.

This month, the Ethereum Foundation formed a dedicated dAI Team with a remit to advance agent identity, trust, and payments, including support for ERC-8004, a draft standard for agent credentials and verification that would anchor identity and attestations at the protocol level.

The initiative frames Ethereum as a settlement and coordination layer for agent economies, with censorship resistance and open access as core design goals, while community drafts around ERC-8004 outline how on-chain identity and trust could allow automated systems to negotiate, post bonds, and execute escrow without custodial intermediaries.

The near-term deliverable is research and standards progress that can be adopted by wallets, middleware, and dApps in 2026, creating a shared trust substrate for agentic applications.

Token flows already reflect an AI tilt in crypto markets.

AI-focused tokens such as Bittensor, Fetch.ai (ASI), Internet Computer, and Render have maintained on-chain activity and relative price stability through Q3, outpacing broader altcoins during the recent market drawdown.

Koinly’s market roundups point to continued demand for decentralized compute, inference, and agent frameworks, while ecosystem reports show ICP’s push for native app hosting and Render’s GPU marketplace drawing steady usage from AI workloads.

Per Token Metrics, DeFi total value locked has rebounded from roughly $72 billion in early 2025 toward the $100 billion area, with new AI-native DeFi rails such as Blackhole DEX on Avalanche, Sahara AI, and Moby AI contributing to volumes and fee generation that persisted through volatility. Token Metrics places this in a broader rotation toward automated liquidity and agent execution that can operate across chains via messaging and omnichain abstractions.

The payments stack is converging on agent use cases at the protocol boundary. Google introduced the Agents to Payments, or AP2, protocol in September to let software agents request and confirm consumer payments through standardized flows, a building block for machine-to-machine billing and subscription patterns that can interface with crypto settlement rails.

According to Google Cloud, AP2 is designed around explicit user consent, verifiable agent identities, and reversible transactions for compliance, and early pilots include Ethereum and ICP integrations via third-party connectors that bridge fiat accounts with on-chain transfers.

As these pilots mature, wallets may treat agents as first-class actors, with ERC-8004 style attestations allowing policies that cap spend per timeframe, restrict counterparties, or require human co-sign for high value thresholds.

Forward models now tie plumbing upgrades to measurable network demand.

Token Metrics’ September scenario work projects AI smart agents reaching 15 to 20 percent of DeFi transaction volume by late Q4, which, if sustained and amplified by Ethereum’s dAI roadmap, places AI-integrated protocols in the $200 to 300 billion TVL range by end-2026.

The same analysis frames a feed-through into base-layer utilization, with gas usage for agent identity and execution contracts rising 30 to 40 percent quarter over quarter in 2026 once standards like ERC-8004 see broad adoption across custody, consumer wallets, and DAO middleware.

In practice, this means governance, treasury rebalancing, fee routing, and cross-chain liquidity management could be executed by software agents that operate with risk limits, insurance, and verifiable credentials on chain.

Security outcomes are another lever in the adoption curve. Academic and industry research on adaptive, AI-assisted contracts points to a sharp drop in successful exploits when contracts can detect anomalies, tune parameters, and quarantine suspicious flows in near real time.

Early models show reductions of up to 70 percent in successful attacks for systems that pair rule-based controls with learned heuristics, relative to static parameter schemes. This result depends on transparent update policies and monitorable on-chain behavior to avoid creating opaque control surfaces, a point that dovetails with supervisory attention on smart contract auditability and incident reporting.

The macro context is turning from concept to pilot.

Regulatory agendas in the United States and Europe include workstreams on automated financial agents, transparency for adaptive contracts, and disclosures around model risk.

DLA Piper’s September brief and other legal trackers describe a path where agent identities, usage policies, and exception handling must be legible to regulators and counterparties, a requirement that aligns with Ethereum’s identity and attestation thrust rather than contradicts it.

Recent enforcement themes place emphasis on control effectiveness, not technology bans, which supports a runway for compliant agent operations as standards mature.

Hiring data remains supportive, with Recruitblock recording a 22 percent year-over-year increase in 2025 for roles at the AI and blockchain intersection, spanning protocol engineers, data infrastructure, and applied cryptography, a pipeline that matters if agent frameworks are to reach production scale across consumer and enterprise touchpoints.

Cross-market, the machine economy lens is not confined to a single stack. Avalanche hosts AI-governed liquidity via Blackhole DEX, Ethereum focuses on identity and settlement, NEAR and ICP court on-chain app hosting and low-latency inference, and Render supplies GPU resources for training and model serving.

Koinly’s and Token Metrics coverage place these in complementary roles rather than direct substitutes, with a thesis that demand for decentralized inference and marketplace coordination expands as agents become default actors in payments, fulfillment, and protocol operations.

If ICP’s growth model for native AI hosting holds, on-chain inference cycles could cut latency by half by 2026, which would make agent interactivity viable for user-facing applications like intent routers, real-time hedging, and supply-chain or IoT settlement.

ProtocolPrimary AI functionOn-chain volume or TVL, Sept 2025Forward focus
EthereumAgent identity and settlement, ERC-8004, dAI Team$38B+Trust and coordination layer for agents
Bittensor, TAODecentralized training and inference markets$1.4B est.Open AI compute exchange
Fetch.ai, FETAutonomous economic agents, dApp infrastructure$640M est.Machine-to-machine coordination
Render, RNDRDecentralized GPU and inference~$985MCompute backbone for on-chain AI
Internet Computer, ICPNative on-chain AI app hosting$800M+Lower latency for agentic dApps
Blackhole DEX, AvalancheAI-governed AMM and liquidity$193MPermissionless agent trading

The scenarios fall into three buckets.

A base case has Ethereum consolidating the identity and trust layer, as at least a quarter of new dApps adopt agent automation by 2026, converging governance, treasury, fees, and payments into programmable policies anchored in attestations.

A bull path turns on a fuller machine economy where agents handle bilateral negotiation and fulfillment across consumer and enterprise contexts, with DeFi TVL moving beyond $300 billion and decentralized AI API marketplaces reaching critical mass for long-tail services.

A bear case centers on regulatory licensing of agents and ongoing centralization of compute and model access, which would cap open participation and bottleneck innovation to a small number of well-funded teams.

DLA Piper’s overview and policy trackers point to transparency and control standards as the fulcrum, not outright prohibitions, yet compute centralization remains a known constraint.

Investors and builders shift from token narratives to measurable adoption triggers.

On the standards side, ERC-8004 is a core watch item, since wallets and custody providers will need to implement attestation checks, recovery flows, and policy enforcement for agents to operate safely in consumer contexts.

On the payments side, AP2 pilots, if extended into crypto rails at scale, would provide the first repeatable pattern for subscriptions, usage billing, and fulfillment between non-human actors, and would pressure bridges and account abstraction stacks to expose fine-grained limits and approvals.

On the security side, field evidence that adaptive controls reduce realized loss would unlock more autonomous governance, especially for parameter tuning in volatile markets. Each of these tracks has public milestones that can be monitored without relying on price charts alone.

The open question is goes beyond whether agents will transact; it is where the settlement and trust checks occur.

If identity, attestations, and policies live on the chain, the machine economy will default to public ledgers, and DeFi will become the operating system for non-human economic activity. If those checks remain in closed platforms, crypto’s role will collapse to bridges and payout rails.

With Ethereum’s dAI mandate, the AP2 pathway for agent payments, and a measurable shift in developer hiring toward AI x crypto roles, the center of gravity is moving toward verifiable, on-chain coordination that treats agents as first-class participants in markets.

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/ai-x-crypto-2025-will-the-machine-economy-fuel-the-next-ethereum-boom/

Market Opportunity
Fuel Logo
Fuel Price(FUEL)
$0.00141
$0.00141$0.00141
-0.70%
USD
Fuel (FUEL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

The post U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The United States is contending with the intricacies of cryptocurrency regulation as newly enacted legislation stirs debate over centralized versus decentralized finance. The recent passage of the GENIUS Act under Bo Hines’ leadership is perceived to skew favor towards centralized entities, potentially disadvantaging decentralized innovations. Continue Reading:U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/u-s-moves-grip-on-crypto-regulation-intensifies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:09
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Why your phone number shows as private and how to remove it

Why your phone number shows as private and how to remove it

Table of contents How to remove private number on your Android How to remove private number on your iPhone (iOS) What to do if your number still shows as Private
Share
Techcabal2026/02/07 00:23