The post FIFA World Cup NFTs Slammed With Criminal Charges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gespa, a Swiss gambling authority, filed a criminal complaint against FIFA for its NFT collection. The regulator claimed that competitions for on-chain rewards may constitute unregistered betting. Still, though, this complaint is non-binding. Gespa offered to cooperate with any prosecution efforts, but it won’t spearhead a case itself. FIFA may be able to reach a non-litigious agreement with government officials. Sponsored Sponsored FIFA’s NFT Competitions Soccer and the crypto sector have had years of overlap at this point, and FIFA has been offering its own NFTs for quite some time. However, this trade may have brought some trouble to the football association, as Swiss authorities may pursue charges against FIFA in the near future. Specifically, Gespa, the Swiss Gambling Supervisory Authority, alleged in a criminal complaint that FIFA’s NFT offerings may constitute gambling. Rather than buying products directly, users enter challenges or await drops in the hope of receiving assets. Due to their monetary value, these NFTs may violate gambling regulations: “Various competitions related to [NFT] collectibles are offered [on FIFA platforms]…Participation in the competitions is only possible in exchange for a monetary stake, with monetary benefits to be won. From a gambling law perspective, the offers in question are partly lotteries and partly sports betting,” Gespa’s complaint read. Sponsored Sponsored New Distribution Schemes? So, why is this a problem now, after several years of operation? For one thing, FIFA switched its partner in NFT generation, using Avalanche instead of Algorand as its underlying blockchain. This brought a huge surge of activity to Avalanche and may have introduced further lottery-like mechanics into asset distribution. Additionally, Gespa claims that it only discovered FIFA’s NFT platform this month. Until then, the regulator was apparently unaware of the competitions, such as drops and challenges, that can allow users to win NFTs. We don’t… The post FIFA World Cup NFTs Slammed With Criminal Charges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gespa, a Swiss gambling authority, filed a criminal complaint against FIFA for its NFT collection. The regulator claimed that competitions for on-chain rewards may constitute unregistered betting. Still, though, this complaint is non-binding. Gespa offered to cooperate with any prosecution efforts, but it won’t spearhead a case itself. FIFA may be able to reach a non-litigious agreement with government officials. Sponsored Sponsored FIFA’s NFT Competitions Soccer and the crypto sector have had years of overlap at this point, and FIFA has been offering its own NFTs for quite some time. However, this trade may have brought some trouble to the football association, as Swiss authorities may pursue charges against FIFA in the near future. Specifically, Gespa, the Swiss Gambling Supervisory Authority, alleged in a criminal complaint that FIFA’s NFT offerings may constitute gambling. Rather than buying products directly, users enter challenges or await drops in the hope of receiving assets. Due to their monetary value, these NFTs may violate gambling regulations: “Various competitions related to [NFT] collectibles are offered [on FIFA platforms]…Participation in the competitions is only possible in exchange for a monetary stake, with monetary benefits to be won. From a gambling law perspective, the offers in question are partly lotteries and partly sports betting,” Gespa’s complaint read. Sponsored Sponsored New Distribution Schemes? So, why is this a problem now, after several years of operation? For one thing, FIFA switched its partner in NFT generation, using Avalanche instead of Algorand as its underlying blockchain. This brought a huge surge of activity to Avalanche and may have introduced further lottery-like mechanics into asset distribution. Additionally, Gespa claims that it only discovered FIFA’s NFT platform this month. Until then, the regulator was apparently unaware of the competitions, such as drops and challenges, that can allow users to win NFTs. We don’t…

FIFA World Cup NFTs Slammed With Criminal Charges

Gespa, a Swiss gambling authority, filed a criminal complaint against FIFA for its NFT collection. The regulator claimed that competitions for on-chain rewards may constitute unregistered betting.

Still, though, this complaint is non-binding. Gespa offered to cooperate with any prosecution efforts, but it won’t spearhead a case itself. FIFA may be able to reach a non-litigious agreement with government officials.

Sponsored

Sponsored

FIFA’s NFT Competitions

Soccer and the crypto sector have had years of overlap at this point, and FIFA has been offering its own NFTs for quite some time.

However, this trade may have brought some trouble to the football association, as Swiss authorities may pursue charges against FIFA in the near future.

Specifically, Gespa, the Swiss Gambling Supervisory Authority, alleged in a criminal complaint that FIFA’s NFT offerings may constitute gambling.

Rather than buying products directly, users enter challenges or await drops in the hope of receiving assets. Due to their monetary value, these NFTs may violate gambling regulations:

Sponsored

Sponsored

New Distribution Schemes?

So, why is this a problem now, after several years of operation? For one thing, FIFA switched its partner in NFT generation, using Avalanche instead of Algorand as its underlying blockchain.

This brought a huge surge of activity to Avalanche and may have introduced further lottery-like mechanics into asset distribution.

Additionally, Gespa claims that it only discovered FIFA’s NFT platform this month. Until then, the regulator was apparently unaware of the competitions, such as drops and challenges, that can allow users to win NFTs.

We don’t know what alerted Gespa to these activities, but its speed of response suggests that it’s concerned.

To be clear, though, the Swiss regulator’s complaint was only one page long. It claims that law enforcement has jurisdiction over whether or not FIFA’s NFT offerings violate the law; Gespa itself takes no official position on the subject.

It offered to assist future investigations but declined to release any more information itself.

In other words, there may be a non-litigious solution here. FIFA may be able to reform its NFT distribution scheme to avoid this complaint, or the association may reach another agreement with Swiss regulators.

For now, though, we’ll have to see if local authorities attempt to pursue Gespa’s case.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/fifa-world-cup-nft-criminal-charges-gambling/

Market Opportunity
AINFT Logo
AINFT Price(NFT)
$0.0000003448
$0.0000003448$0.0000003448
+0.11%
USD
AINFT (NFT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

New Zealand RBNZ Interest Rate Decision in line with expectations (2.25%)

New Zealand RBNZ Interest Rate Decision in line with expectations (2.25%)

The post New Zealand RBNZ Interest Rate Decision in line with expectations (2.25%) appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is attempting a bounce from the $4,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/18 09:53
Mississippi holds hearing on xAI data center amid environmental lawsuit threat

Mississippi holds hearing on xAI data center amid environmental lawsuit threat

The Southern Environmental Law Center claims that a planned gas-fired power plant set to power xAI's Colossus II data center will be the largest new source of pollution
Share
Rappler2026/02/18 10:37
Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

The post Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto assets send conflicting signals ahead of the Federal Reserve’s September rate decision. On-chain data reveals a clear decrease in Bitcoin and Ethereum flowing into centralized exchanges, but a sharp increase in altcoin inflows. The findings come from a Tuesday report by CryptoQuant, an on-chain data platform. The firm’s data shows a stark divergence in coin volume, which has been observed in movements onto centralized exchanges over the past few weeks. Bitcoin and Ethereum Inflows Drop to Multi-Month Lows Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin has seen a dramatic drop in exchange inflows, with the 7-day moving average plummeting to 25,000 BTC, its lowest level in over a year. The average deposit per transaction has fallen to 0.57 BTC as of September. This suggests that smaller retail investors, rather than large-scale whales, are responsible for the recent cash-outs. Ethereum is showing a similar trend, with its daily exchange inflows decreasing to a two-month low. CryptoQuant reported that the 7-day moving average for ETH deposits on exchanges is around 783,000 ETH, the lowest in two months. Other Altcoins See Renewed Selling Pressure In contrast, other altcoin deposit activity on exchanges has surged. The number of altcoin deposit transactions on centralized exchanges was quite steady in May and June of this year, maintaining a 7-day moving average of about 20,000 to 30,000. Recently, however, that figure has jumped to 55,000 transactions. Altcoins: Exchange Inflow Transaction Count. Source: CryptoQuant CryptoQuant projects that altcoins, given their increased inflow activity, could face relatively higher selling pressure compared to BTC and ETH. Meanwhile, the balance of stablecoins on exchanges—a key indicator of potential buying pressure—has increased significantly. The report notes that the exchange USDT balance, around $273 million in April, grew to $379 million by August 31, marking a new yearly high. CryptoQuant interprets this surge as a reflection of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:01