The post Ledger CTO: Quantum Computer Unlikely to Break Bitcoin In Near Term appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Charles Guillemet, chief technology officer at hardware wallet giant Ledger, has opined that a quantum computer is unlikely to break Bitcoin’s current cryptography.    That said, Guillemet believes such a black swan event is not impossible, and the quantum threat should not be ignored.  The “prudent” solution  Guillemet has argued in favor of proactively upgrading the current Bitcoin protocol in order to make sure that it remains quantum-resistant. This would require defining a “migration path,” which would include those coins that are presumed to be lost (such as Satoshi Nakamoto’s enormous 1.1 million stash).   You Might Also Like Guillemet has warned that such migration would come with trade-offs. The Ledger CTO has warned that lattice-based cryptography, which is considered to be the leading candidate for quantum-resistant encryption, is still relatively new and unproven. “Lattice-based post-quantum cryptography hasn’t yet stood the test of time, and hash-based schemes feel archaic,” said Guillemet. Moreover, he has noted that quantum-resistant schemes might not work properly with the existing BIP32 structure. Source: https://u.today/ledger-cto-quantum-computer-unlikely-to-break-bitcoin-in-near-termThe post Ledger CTO: Quantum Computer Unlikely to Break Bitcoin In Near Term appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Charles Guillemet, chief technology officer at hardware wallet giant Ledger, has opined that a quantum computer is unlikely to break Bitcoin’s current cryptography.    That said, Guillemet believes such a black swan event is not impossible, and the quantum threat should not be ignored.  The “prudent” solution  Guillemet has argued in favor of proactively upgrading the current Bitcoin protocol in order to make sure that it remains quantum-resistant. This would require defining a “migration path,” which would include those coins that are presumed to be lost (such as Satoshi Nakamoto’s enormous 1.1 million stash).   You Might Also Like Guillemet has warned that such migration would come with trade-offs. The Ledger CTO has warned that lattice-based cryptography, which is considered to be the leading candidate for quantum-resistant encryption, is still relatively new and unproven. “Lattice-based post-quantum cryptography hasn’t yet stood the test of time, and hash-based schemes feel archaic,” said Guillemet. Moreover, he has noted that quantum-resistant schemes might not work properly with the existing BIP32 structure. Source: https://u.today/ledger-cto-quantum-computer-unlikely-to-break-bitcoin-in-near-term

Ledger CTO: Quantum Computer Unlikely to Break Bitcoin In Near Term

Charles Guillemet, chief technology officer at hardware wallet giant Ledger, has opined that a quantum computer is unlikely to break Bitcoin’s current cryptography.   

That said, Guillemet believes such a black swan event is not impossible, and the quantum threat should not be ignored. 

The “prudent” solution 

Guillemet has argued in favor of proactively upgrading the current Bitcoin protocol in order to make sure that it remains quantum-resistant. This would require defining a “migration path,” which would include those coins that are presumed to be lost (such as Satoshi Nakamoto’s enormous 1.1 million stash).  

You Might Also Like

Guillemet has warned that such migration would come with trade-offs. The Ledger CTO has warned that lattice-based cryptography, which is considered to be the leading candidate for quantum-resistant encryption, is still relatively new and unproven. “Lattice-based post-quantum cryptography hasn’t yet stood the test of time, and hash-based schemes feel archaic,” said Guillemet.

Moreover, he has noted that quantum-resistant schemes might not work properly with the existing BIP32 structure.

Source: https://u.today/ledger-cto-quantum-computer-unlikely-to-break-bitcoin-in-near-term

Market Opportunity
QUANTUM Logo
QUANTUM Price(QUANTUM)
$0.00321
$0.00321$0.00321
-0.12%
USD
QUANTUM (QUANTUM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Wyoming-based crypto bank Custodia files rehearing petition against Fed

Wyoming-based crypto bank Custodia files rehearing petition against Fed

The post Wyoming-based crypto bank Custodia files rehearing petition against Fed appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A Wyoming-based crypto bank has filed another
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 22:06
US economy adds 64,000 jobs in November but unemployment rate climbs to 4.6%

US economy adds 64,000 jobs in November but unemployment rate climbs to 4.6%

The post US economy adds 64,000 jobs in November but unemployment rate climbs to 4.6% appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The economy moved in two directions at
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 22:18