The post Crypto News: Analyst Calls 4-Year Cycle Strategy ‘Colossal Mistake’; Here’s Why appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insight: Dan Gambardello challenges the four-year cycle theory, sparking discussions in the crypto news space. The market operates on liquidity cycles, not Bitcoin halving schedules. Altcoins have decoupled from Bitcoin halving timing completely. Crypto news continues to focus on market cycles as analyst Dan Gambardello released a detailed analysis challenging the traditional four-year cycle framework. The crypto market expert argues that following this timing model could be a “colossal mistake” for investors. Gambardello’s thesis centers on liquidity cycles rather than halving events as the primary driver of crypto market movements. The analysis comes as Bitcoin trades below key moving averages and the crypto prices face continued consolidation. Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Theory Faces Scrutiny Gambardello opened his analysis by examining technical indicators from previous bear markets. The 20-week moving average crossing below the 50-week moving average preceded major bottoms in 2014, 2018, and 2021. The 2014 and 2018 bear markets both saw approximately 161 days from the moving average cross to the bottom. The 2021 bear market crypto news extended this timeline to 238 days. The current crypto market structure shows that the 20-week moving average has not yet crossed below the 50-week moving average. Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Analysis | Source: Dan Gambardello, X If this cross occurs within one to two months and follows a similar 150-day decline pattern, Bitcoin would face around 200 total days of downside. Gambardello argues this scenario is unlikely based on macro conditions. The analyst points to the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) as the overlooked factor. During the 2014, 2018, and 2021 bear markets, PMI was falling in each case. The business cycle indicator has been contracting for a record period. Current data suggests this contraction is ending as quantitative tightening concludes. Liquidity Cycles Drive Crypto Prices, Not Halving Events The core… The post Crypto News: Analyst Calls 4-Year Cycle Strategy ‘Colossal Mistake’; Here’s Why appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insight: Dan Gambardello challenges the four-year cycle theory, sparking discussions in the crypto news space. The market operates on liquidity cycles, not Bitcoin halving schedules. Altcoins have decoupled from Bitcoin halving timing completely. Crypto news continues to focus on market cycles as analyst Dan Gambardello released a detailed analysis challenging the traditional four-year cycle framework. The crypto market expert argues that following this timing model could be a “colossal mistake” for investors. Gambardello’s thesis centers on liquidity cycles rather than halving events as the primary driver of crypto market movements. The analysis comes as Bitcoin trades below key moving averages and the crypto prices face continued consolidation. Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Theory Faces Scrutiny Gambardello opened his analysis by examining technical indicators from previous bear markets. The 20-week moving average crossing below the 50-week moving average preceded major bottoms in 2014, 2018, and 2021. The 2014 and 2018 bear markets both saw approximately 161 days from the moving average cross to the bottom. The 2021 bear market crypto news extended this timeline to 238 days. The current crypto market structure shows that the 20-week moving average has not yet crossed below the 50-week moving average. Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Analysis | Source: Dan Gambardello, X If this cross occurs within one to two months and follows a similar 150-day decline pattern, Bitcoin would face around 200 total days of downside. Gambardello argues this scenario is unlikely based on macro conditions. The analyst points to the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) as the overlooked factor. During the 2014, 2018, and 2021 bear markets, PMI was falling in each case. The business cycle indicator has been contracting for a record period. Current data suggests this contraction is ending as quantitative tightening concludes. Liquidity Cycles Drive Crypto Prices, Not Halving Events The core…

Crypto News: Analyst Calls 4-Year Cycle Strategy ‘Colossal Mistake’; Here’s Why

4 min read

Key Insight:

  • Dan Gambardello challenges the four-year cycle theory, sparking discussions in the crypto news space.
  • The market operates on liquidity cycles, not Bitcoin halving schedules.
  • Altcoins have decoupled from Bitcoin halving timing completely.

Crypto news continues to focus on market cycles as analyst Dan Gambardello released a detailed analysis challenging the traditional four-year cycle framework.

The crypto market expert argues that following this timing model could be a “colossal mistake” for investors. Gambardello’s thesis centers on liquidity cycles rather than halving events as the primary driver of crypto market movements.

The analysis comes as Bitcoin trades below key moving averages and the crypto prices face continued consolidation.

Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Theory Faces Scrutiny

Gambardello opened his analysis by examining technical indicators from previous bear markets. The 20-week moving average crossing below the 50-week moving average preceded major bottoms in 2014, 2018, and 2021.

The 2014 and 2018 bear markets both saw approximately 161 days from the moving average cross to the bottom. The 2021 bear market crypto news extended this timeline to 238 days.

The current crypto market structure shows that the 20-week moving average has not yet crossed below the 50-week moving average.

Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Analysis | Source: Dan Gambardello, X

If this cross occurs within one to two months and follows a similar 150-day decline pattern, Bitcoin would face around 200 total days of downside. Gambardello argues this scenario is unlikely based on macro conditions.

The analyst points to the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) as the overlooked factor. During the 2014, 2018, and 2021 bear markets, PMI was falling in each case.

The business cycle indicator has been contracting for a record period. Current data suggests this contraction is ending as quantitative tightening concludes.

Liquidity Cycles Drive Crypto Prices, Not Halving Events

The core argument in this crypto news analysis challenges the reason behind past bull markets.

Gambardello overlays historical price action with global liquidity expansions. The 2013, 2017, and 2020-21 bull markets all coincided with major liquidity expansion periods. Each of these expansions happened to align with Bitcoin halving events.

The analyst argues that the halving served as an overlay while liquidity was the crucial factor driving crypto prices higher. The supply shock from halvings remains real and contributes to long-term Bitcoin appreciation.

However, Gambardello mentioned the halving isn’t the ingredient creating crypto bull and bear markets. It functions as one fundamental tailwind inside much larger liquidity cycles.

Record-breaking PMI weakness occurred while the crypto market entered what many assumed would be a typical post-halving bull run.

Institutional Control Changes Crypto Market Dynamics

Gambardello cites commentary from analysts noting the rise of institutional control. The crypto market now behaves like an asset class rather than a retail experiment.

In other crypto news, exchange-traded funds exist for Bitcoin, with multiple altcoin ETF applications pending approval. Bitcoin trades with clear correlations to macro assets.

Altcoins follow liquidity cycles and institutional flows rather than halving schedules.

Crypto Market Four-Year Cycle | Source: Dan Gambardello

He also mentioned that flows have become algorithmic rather than emotional. Global liquidity drives price action across the crypto market.

Analyst Wilberforce noted on social media that institutional control may stretch the traditional four-year cycle into five years.

Every major rally in crypto history aligned with global liquidity expansions. Every stagnation or crash is aligned with liquidity tightening.

The halvings occurred during these periods, but didn’t drive the underlying price movements. Liquidity now flows into competing assets, including artificial intelligence stocks, equities, and technology sectors.

Altcoins Decouple from Bitcoin Halving Cycle

In other crypto news, Gambardello argues altcoins have officially broken away from Bitcoin halving schedules.

Altcoin cycles will now be driven by ETF demand, institutional rotations, on-chain activity, sector narratives, liquidity flows, AI adoption, layer-2 growth, and interoperability cycles.

Major assets, including Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, and Avalanche, no longer move on a Bitcoin halving clock.

The crypto market has entered a brand new game with entirely different dynamics than 2013, 2017, or even 2021. What replaces the four-year cycle is the first true liquidity cycle of the cryptocurrency era.

This cycle is driven by Federal Reserve balance sheet inflections, treasury cash flows, bond issuance cycles, repo market stress, PMI reversals, international liquidity from China and Japan, ETF flows, institutional rebalancing, and cross-asset liquidity correlations.

Analyst Hunter Horsley described the psychological element of cycle expectations. Investors believe in four-year cycles and sell in 2025, expecting a down year.

The contraction of the business cycle over recent years has created this mental element where investors sell, thinking the bear market is starting.

The halving clock no longer drives crypto prices. Liquidity cycles have replaced timing based on supply events as the primary market driver.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/11/20/crypto-news-analyst-calls-4-year-cycle-strategy-colossal-mistake-heres-why/

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.01212
$0.01212$0.01212
-1.46%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump MAGA statue has strange crypto backstory

Trump MAGA statue has strange crypto backstory

The post Trump MAGA statue has strange crypto backstory appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A 15-foot-tall statue of former President Donald Trump, cast in bronze
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/04 08:22
ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

The post ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jimmy Kimmel (Photo by Media Access Awards Presented By Easterseals/Getty Images for Easterseals) Getty Images for Easterseals The shock decision by ABC to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! “indefinitely” after the late-night host’s remarks about the killing of Charlie Kirk has created a rare moment in modern TV media: A major show abruptly taken off the air, with its network forced into crisis-management mode. Rare, that is, but not unprecedented. What might go unnoticed by many people reacting to the news about Kimmel and his potential cancellation is that this is not the first time ABC has made such a move. In fact, a version of the same thing happened to Kimmel’s predecessor program — Bill Maher’s Politically Incorrect, which once had Kimmel’s slot and which ABC cancelled in the wake of a firestorm around comments Maher made in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. (Notice, by the way, that I said cancelled “in the wake of” and not “because of.” More on that in a moment.) Here’s what happened: Less than a week after 9/11, Maher and a panel were talking about then-President George W. Bush’s use of the word “cowards” to describe the hijackers. “We have been the cowards,” Maher interjected, referencing the practice of “lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That’s cowardly.” But Maher then went even farther over the line: Actually staying in an airplane as it hits a building? “Not cowardly.” You can read more about the ensuing uproar in this ABC news story from 2001, which includes a statement that Maher issued through his publicist: “In no way was I intending to say, nor have I ever thought, that the men and women who defend our nation in uniform are anything but courageous and valiant, and I offer my apologies to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:02
The real-life inspiration for the protagonist of "The Big Short": Bitcoin crash may trigger a $1 billion gold and silver sell-off.

The real-life inspiration for the protagonist of "The Big Short": Bitcoin crash may trigger a $1 billion gold and silver sell-off.

PANews reported on February 4th that, according to CoinDesk, Michael Burry, the real-life inspiration for the character in "The Big Short" (and an investor who
Share
PANews2026/02/04 08:22