The post Crypto ETF News: SEC Stops 3x and 5x Crypto ETFs to Protect Market Stability appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The U.S. crypto ETF market slowed after the SEC blocked new high-leverage ETF proposals. Several firms wanted to launch 3x and 5x crypto ETFs, but the SEC told them to change their plans or withdraw. The agency is worried that extreme leverage could create instability in crypto and traditional markets. Why Regulators Pushed Back Bloomberg …The post Crypto ETF News: SEC Stops 3x and 5x Crypto ETFs to Protect Market Stability appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The U.S. crypto ETF market slowed after the SEC blocked new high-leverage ETF proposals. Several firms wanted to launch 3x and 5x crypto ETFs, but the SEC told them to change their plans or withdraw. The agency is worried that extreme leverage could create instability in crypto and traditional markets. Why Regulators Pushed Back Bloomberg …

Crypto ETF News: SEC Stops 3x and 5x Crypto ETFs to Protect Market Stability

2025/12/03 15:03
3 min read
SEC blocks leveraged crypto ETFs

The post Crypto ETF News: SEC Stops 3x and 5x Crypto ETFs to Protect Market Stability appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

The U.S. crypto ETF market slowed after the SEC blocked new high-leverage ETF proposals. Several firms wanted to launch 3x and 5x crypto ETFs, but the SEC told them to change their plans or withdraw. The agency is worried that extreme leverage could create instability in crypto and traditional markets.

Why Regulators Pushed Back

Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas said the SEC believes some firms were trying to bypass rules under Rule 18f-4, which limits how risky funds using derivatives can be. The rule generally allows up to 2x leverage, so anything higher needs special approval.

The SEC warned that 3x or 5x crypto ETFs could collapse during market swings, causing shutdowns and adding instability. The same concerns apply to leveraged ETFs tied to individual stocks and high-risk sectors.

Firms like Direxion were singled out for trying to list highly leveraged ETFs. The SEC told them to either redesign the funds to meet the rules or withdraw their applications.

Surge in Filings Raises Concerns

Regulators have been worried about these products for months. In October, Brian Daly from the SEC said the agency received a flood of leveraged ETF filings, many asking for 3x or 5x exposure, which exceeds Rule 18f-4 limits.

  • Also Read :
  •   Gary Gensler Warns Crypto Still “Speculative” Says Only Bitcoin Has Real Standing
  •   ,

VolShares proposed 5x ETFs for Solana, Ethereum, XRP, and volatile tech stocks like Nvidia and Tesla. GraniteShares also filed for a 3x XRP ETF, adding to the wave of high-leverage products now under review.

Crypto Community Reacts

Crypto traders and analysts have had mixed reactions. Hammerstone Markets noted the irony, saying SEC Chair Atkins had recently claimed the agency’s role is not to “protect investors” but to let capitalism thrive, meaning firms offering ultra-leveraged ETFs were just taking risks.

On the other hand, analyst Tolga Yilmaz said the SEC’s decision was expected. He explained that 3x–5x ETFs can break risk limits, lose value quickly in volatile markets, and create harmful feedback loops. Another analyst added that leverage isn’t the only issue—even a 2x MicroStrategy ETF could stop out faster than a 5x Treasury product.

Most agree that ultra-leveraged crypto ETFs are risky, likely to fail in volatile conditions, and dangerous for retail traders. The SEC’s move is therefore more about preventing market blowups than blocking innovation.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

Why did the SEC block 3x and 5x crypto ETFs?

The SEC blocked them because extreme leverage can magnify losses, trigger fund failures during volatility, and create broader market instability.

Are high-leverage crypto ETFs riskier for retail investors?

Yes. High-leverage crypto ETFs can lose value fast, face liquidation during swings, and behave unpredictably, making them risky for everyday investors.

Which firms tried to launch ultra-leveraged crypto ETFs?

Several issuers, including major ETF providers, sought 3x–5x crypto ETFs. Regulators told them to revise plans or withdraw due to excessive risk.

Could leveraged crypto ETFs cause market instability?

They can. Ultra-leveraged ETFs may collapse in sharp moves, forcing shutdowns or rapid trading that adds stress to both crypto and traditional markets.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.000905
$0.000905$0.000905
+3.07%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz February 21 2026: Today’s Correct Answer and How to Earn Free In-App Tokens The Spur Protocol Daily Quiz for February 21, 2026, is
Share
Hokanews2026/02/21 17:10
Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

The post Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline A central figure in the Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse saga—former prosecutor Alex Acosta, who granted in 2007 the former financier what’s been widely blasted as a “sweetheart deal” for his alleged crimes—has no regrets about the agreement, a Democratic lawmaker told CNN on Friday, as the former Trump official faces questioning from the House Oversight Committee. Alex Acosta, center, arrives for a House Oversight Committee deposition about Jeffrey Epstein on September 19 in Washington D.C. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Key Facts This story is breaking and will be updated. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/09/19/prosecutor-acosta-who-gave-epstein-sweetheart-deal-testifies-he-no-remorse-lawmaker-says/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 06:37