The post OKX And Mantra Clash Over OM Token Price Manipulation Allegations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OKX and Mantra clash over OM token manipulation The post OKX And Mantra Clash Over OM Token Price Manipulation Allegations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OKX and Mantra clash over OM token manipulation

OKX And Mantra Clash Over OM Token Price Manipulation Allegations

2025/12/15 01:41

OKX and Mantra clash over OM token manipulation claims as token migration and regulatory investigations intensify.

A dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and the Mantra project has escalated following allegations of price manipulation involving the OM token. The conflict centers on claims that coordinated accounts manipulated OM’s value using it as collateral for large USDT loans.

OKX claims to have acted in response to irregular trading behavior, while Mantra’s leadership demands complete transparency regarding token holdings and transaction practices.

Mantra CEO Seeks Token Transparency

Mantra CEO John Patrick Mullin responded to OKX’s allegations with an open letter, published on Twitter, requesting full disclosure from the exchange.

Mullin asked OKX to provide details on how many OM tokens belong to users versus what remains on the company’s balance sheet. He also addressed confusion over the upcoming OM token migration.

According to Mullin, the existing ERC-20 version of OM will be deprecated on January 15, 2026. After that, the token will undergo a protocol-level upgrade and a 1:4 token split.

Mullin clarified that users will not need to take action during this process, aiming to dispel concerns among token holders.

OKX Claims Coordinated Manipulation and Defends Actions

In its response, OKX rejected the claims made in Mullin’s letter and stated that it had acted to protect market integrity.

The exchange accused several accounts of coordinating to use OM as collateral for USDT borrowing, which it says led to artificial inflation of OM’s price. OKX’s internal risk team flagged the behavior and requested that the account holders adjust their positions, but received no cooperation.

Following these developments, OKX intervened by taking control of the involved accounts. The OM token experienced a sharp price drop soon after.

OKX stated that it had liquidated only a limited amount of OM and absorbed related losses using its Security Fund. The exchange also noted that external perpetual trading activity on OKX contributed to the price crash.

Related Reading: OKX Seychelles Settles with U.S. DOJ, Pays $84M Fine

Legal and Regulatory Actions Underway

OKX confirmed that it has submitted its findings and documentation to regulatory authorities and law enforcement.

It maintained that it followed all internal protocols and acted responsibly in response to suspicious activity. The exchange also questioned the origin of extensive OM holdings by some entities involved in the situation.

Despite OKX’s stance, Mullin has continued to call for further transparency. He believes the dispute stems from a lack of clarity around the OM token migration process and maintains that the public deserves more insight into OKX’s OM token management.

The matter remains under investigation, with both parties holding their positions amid ongoing legal processes.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/okx-and-mantra-clash-over-om-token-price-manipulation-allegations/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

The post Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The lead developer of Shiba Inu, Shytoshi Kusama, has publicly addressed the Shibarium bridge exploit that occurred recently, draining $2.4 million from the network. After days of speculation about his involvement in managing the crisis, the project leader broke his silence. Kusama emphasized that a special “war room” has been set up to restore stolen finances and enhance network security. The statement is his first official words since the bridge compromise occurred. “Although I am focusing on AI initiatives to benefit all our tokens, I remain with the developers and leadership in the war room,” Kusama posted on social media platform X. He dismissed claims that he had distanced himself from the project as “utterly preposterous.” The developer said that the reason behind his silence at first was strategic. Before he could make any statements publicly, he must have taken time to evaluate what he termed a complex and deep situation properly. Kusama also vowed to provide further updates in the official Shiba Inu channels as the team comes up with long-term solutions. As highlighted in our previous article, targeted Shibarium’s bridge infrastructure through a sophisticated attack vector. Hackers gained unauthorized access to validator signing keys, compromising the network’s security framework. The hackers executed a flash loan to acquire 4.6 million BONE ShibaSwap tokens. The validator power on the network was majority held by them after this purchase. They were able to transfer assets out of Shibarium with this control. The response of Shibarium developers was timely to limit the breach. They instantly halted all validator functions in order to avoid additional exploitation. The team proceeded to deposit the assets under staking in a multisig hardware wallet that is secure. External security companies were involved in the investigation effort. Hexens, Seal 911, and PeckShield are collaborating with internal developers to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:46