In a post on X, Alex Svanevik, CEO of blockchain analytics platform Nansen, called out his frustration with what he described as a defensive mindset that has theIn a post on X, Alex Svanevik, CEO of blockchain analytics platform Nansen, called out his frustration with what he described as a defensive mindset that has the

Why is Nansen's CEO warning the Ethereum Foundation?

2025/12/15 23:11

In a post on X, Alex Svanevik, CEO of blockchain analytics platform Nansen, called out his frustration with what he described as a defensive mindset that has the Ethereum community in a stranglehold, especially when people compare its KPIs with the field. 

“I love Ethereum, it got me into crypto, and I still hold ETH. But I honestly can’t stand the complacency culture that’s being championed these days,” he stated.

The Nansen CEO criticized the community’s tendency to dismiss unfavorable data, writing “Any time you bring up an area where Ethereum is falling behind, you’re met with “those metrics are fake” or “we still have TVL.”

“Ethereum needs to be paranoid,” Svanevik warned, quoting Andrew S. Grove’s famous book titled “Only the Paranoid Survive.”

Svanevik added an ominous warning to his post, stating that “If the community doesn’t get more paranoid, it’ll be irrelevant by 2030.”

Why is Nansen’s CEO warning the Ethereum Foundation?

Ethereum’s standing as the leading smart-contract platform has long been anchored in its first-mover advantage, deep liquidity, and broad developer base. However, Svanevik’s comments bring to the fore an industry discourse that questions the ability of Ethereum to sustain its lead over the long term as competing chains and Layer-2 solutions grow in scale and sophistication.

Ethereum’s rivals, from networks like Solana to low-fee chains and modular Layer-2 ecosystems, frequently claim better performance across specific on-chain metrics, fueling narratives that challengers have begun eating into Ethereum’s share of activity.

And those airing their concerns about the movement of the challengers may not be wrong, as the numbers seem to agree with them; over the past 30 days, Ethereum generated over $14.52 million in fees. Tron and Solana saw more fees in the past 30 days, raking in over $28.67 million and $18.13 million, respectively.

Nansen CEO Svanevik warns ETH: Get more paranoid or be irrelevant by 2030Ethereum saw $14.52 million in fees, while Tron and Solana raked in over $28.67 million and $18.13 million in the last 30 days. Source: Defillama

Svanevik’s warning appears to be an appeal for the Ethereum community to confront these competitive pressures candidly and build a culture that takes external threats seriously rather than dismissing them.

Svanevik calls for cultural transformation and pushback

Svanevik stated that Ethereum’s path forward requires more than technical improvements. The CEO of Nansen has been vocal about how revenue is a major indicator of growth, pointing out that it is harder to fake compared to user counts and TVL.

He said, “If I had to pick one metric to define a winning blockchain, it’s revenue. That’s what people are actually paying to use your chain.”

Some members of the crypto community agreed with Svanevik’s recent comments, with some drawing lessons from Kodak and BlackBerry, commending Svanevik for bringing the matter up.

However, others disagreed, as they believe the Ethereum Foundation has been working actively to better the ecosystem, especially with the upgrades it has carried out this year.

Liam, founder of Layer 2 Roundup, wrote, “In 2025, the EF underwent a complete leadership overhaul and announced highly ambitious initiatives such as Lean Ethereum, etc.

Curious to know where you think the ‘complacency’ is when it comes to things that are actually being done?

If you’re referring to a few random CT accounts that don’t really do anything other than post on X, then I’m not sure what you’re claiming here is at all relevant in reality.”

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001529
$0.00000001529$0.00000001529
-11.46%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41