The High Court said the President did not commit grave abuse of discretion when he certified as urgent the 2024 GAA; Justice Leonen, however, said the declarationThe High Court said the President did not commit grave abuse of discretion when he certified as urgent the 2024 GAA; Justice Leonen, however, said the declaration

FACT CHECK: SC did not declare grounds for impeachment vs Marcos over 2024 budget

2025/12/16 11:16

Claim: The Supreme Court (SC) ruled that the 2024 General Appropriations Act (GAA) is unconstitutional and declared grounds for impeachment against President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr.

Rating: FALSE

Why we fact-checked this: A YouTube video uploaded on December 6 carried the title, “Korte hinatulan si BBM! Impeachment ground na ito!” (The court has ruled against BBM! These are grounds for impeachment!)

The thumbnail shows images of several officials with bold red text that reads “Ground for impeachment.” It also features a quote alleging that the 2024 national budget is unconstitutional. 

Text at the bottom states: “Supreme Court hinatulan na si BBM! Unconstitutional ang 2024 GAA! Ground for impeachment na! Lagot!” 

(The Supreme Court has ruled against BBM! The 2024 GAA is unconstitutional! This already constitutes grounds for impeachment! He’s in trouble!) 

The video’s narration cites statements from Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen, framing them as representative of the SC’s official decision against Marcos.

As of writing, the video has garnered more than 22,000 views, 1,700 likes, and 180 comments.

The facts: The Supreme Court did not rule that the 2024 General Appropriations Act (GAA) is unconstitutional, nor did it declare grounds for impeachment against Marcos.

In a unanimous decision on the PhilHealth fund transfer case, the High Court struck down Special Provision 1(d) of the 2024 GAA, which authorized the return of the fund balance or the excess reserve funds of government-owned or controlled corporations to the National Treasury. The SC did not rule that the entire GAA is unconstitutional.

The SC also upheld the validity of Marcos certifying the 2024 GAA as urgent, saying the President acted within his authority.

Leonen, however, disagreed. In his separate opinion, Leonen wrote that Marcos committed “grave abuse of discretion” by issuing a certification of urgency for the 2024 budget and argued that the entire 2024 GAA is unconstitutional.

According to Leonen, the certification of urgency “did not warrant the immediate enactment of House Bill No. 8980 (GAA bill 2024) as the circumstances of the case reveal that no public calamity or emergency existed at that time.”

The misleading YouTube video falsely frames Leonen’s opinion as the unanimous ruling of the Supreme Court. In reality, it reflects a single justice’s views. The Court did not adopt Leonen’s position that the 2024 budget was unconstitutional.

Leonen also never explicitly stated that Marcos’ issuance of a certification of urgency constitutes grounds for impeachment.

PhilHealth case: In the ruling penned by Associate Justice Amy Lazaro Javier, the High Court ordered the return of P60 billion in PhilHealth funds earlier transferred to the National Treasury and permanently barred the transfer of the remaining P29.9-billion fund balance.

The decision stemmed from petitions filed by several groups and public health advocates that sought to block the order of the Department of Finance to transfer P89.9 billion in “excess” PhilHealth funds to the national treasury.

No “impeachment”: Marcos has weathered waves of impeachment and resignation rumors, especially after the explosive investigations into the controversial flood control projects and the bicam insertions revealed by former lawmaker Zaldy Co, who implicated Marcos as a key figure in these controversies. (READ: Zaldy Co, whistleblower?) 

To date, no impeachment complaint has prospered against Marcos, and the President has shut down any talks of stepping down. 

Rappler has fact-checked several impeachment claims about Marcos in the past: 

  • FACT CHECK: No impeachment complaint vs Marcos
  • FALSE: Justice Leonen impeached, Bongbong Marcos wins electoral protest
  • FACT CHECK: Supreme Court did not file charges vs Marcos

– Cyril Bocar/Rappler.com

Efren Cyril Bocar is a journalist from Llorente, Eastern Samar who graduated with a degree in English Language Studies at the Visayas State University. Cyril is also a graduate of the Aries Rufo Journalism Fellowship of Rappler for 2024. 

Keep us aware of suspicious Facebook pages, groups, accounts, websites, articles, or photos in your network by contacting us at [email protected]. Let us battle disinformation one Fact Check at a time.

Market Opportunity
Factor Logo
Factor Price(FACT)
$1,23
$1,23$1,23
+0,81%
USD
Factor (FACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41