Garlinghouse said the NYT repeated half-truths while omitting judges' criticisms of the SEC's actions during the Biden administration's crypto crackdown.Garlinghouse said the NYT repeated half-truths while omitting judges' criticisms of the SEC's actions during the Biden administration's crypto crackdown.

Not Journalism: Ripple CEO Slams NYT Over ‘Crypto Hit Piece’

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse criticized The New York Times, accusing it of publishing biased and misleading stories about the crypto industry after a report on the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) easing crypto enforcement under President Donald Trump’s second term.

Hitting back on X, Garlinghouse said the report was “another crypto hit piece.” He argued that the paper continues to recycle the same narrative while ignoring key court rulings that undermined the SEC’s approach during the Biden administration. He accused the NYT of relying on “half-truths and outright omissions” to justify what he called an “illegal War on Crypto” waged by the previous administration.

“False and Failed Narrative”

Garlinghouse specifically criticized the report for failing to mention multiple federal judges who rebuked the SEC, including US Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn, who said the agency’s leadership failed to show “faithful allegiance to the law,” another who ruled the SEC’s actions were “arbitrary and capricious,” and a third who fined the regulator for making false statements to the court.

He also questioned why the NYT did not publish similar headlines during the Biden years, when the SEC aggressively pursued crypto firms, including Ripple, through what many in the industry viewed as regulation by enforcement. While adding that the coverage was actively advancing a “false and failed narrative,” Garlinghouse wrote,

His comments came in response to a December 14 investigation by the NYT, which claimed that the SEC has pulled back from more than 60% of ongoing crypto cases since Trump returned to office, pausing litigation, reducing penalties, or dismissing cases altogether.

The report found that several of the benefiting firms, including Ripple, had financial or political ties to Trump, but stated that it found no evidence of direct pressure from the president or of improper influence by the companies. In Ripple’s case, the SEC attempted to reduce a previously court-ordered $125 million penalty to $50 million, a move that was ultimately rejected by a judge.

NYT Coverage “Crypto Dementia”

Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at Galaxy Digital, also criticized the NYT and said that the coverage relied on a false premise. In a post on X, Thorn argued that the report treated the Biden administration’s crackdown on crypto as normal when it was anything but.

Thorn went on to assert that it was dishonest to suggest the regulatory change was driven by Trump’s personal crypto interests. He added,

The post Not Journalism: Ripple CEO Slams NYT Over ‘Crypto Hit Piece’ appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005022
$0.0005022$0.0005022
-3.90%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Optum Golf Channel Games Debut In Prime Time

Optum Golf Channel Games Debut In Prime Time

The post Optum Golf Channel Games Debut In Prime Time appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. FARMINGDALE, NEW YORK – SEPTEMBER 28: (L-R) Scottie Scheffler of Team
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 07:21
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00
Read Trend And Momentum Across Markets

Read Trend And Momentum Across Markets

The post Read Trend And Momentum Across Markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Widely used in technical analysis, the MACD indicator helps traders read trend
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 07:14