China’s markets spent the day sliding toward a correction as traders dumped tech and braced for more weak data. The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index dropped 1.China’s markets spent the day sliding toward a correction as traders dumped tech and braced for more weak data. The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index dropped 1.

Tech losses and weak growth data hit China’s Hang Seng and MSCI China indexes

China’s markets spent the day sliding toward a correction as traders dumped tech and braced for more weak data. The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index dropped 1.8%, and the MSCI China Index fell 1.6%, with both touching technical correction levels before pulling back slightly. Losses hit fast as tech names lost steam and growth fears pushed investors to cut risk.

Alibaba and Tencent dragged the hardest, and a Hong Kong tech gauge sat right on the edge of a bear market. The mood was already shaky, and this move made it worse.

Fresh numbers this week signaled another hit to economic confidence. Traders said this raised the risk of weakness spreading to other assets.

Many now worry that Beijing will keep delaying any major stimulus. That has left the world’s second-largest market dealing with soft demand, weak housing, and deflation pressure all at the same time.

Investors cut exposure as weak demand hits confidence

“Deflation, soft consumption, real estate weakness, involution — none of these issues seem to have been definitively resolved,” Vey-Sern Ling of Union Bancaire Privee said. He added that profit-taking makes sense with this kind of uncertainty.

That pretty much summed up the day. China’s earlier rally, fueled by excitement around DeepSeek, had turned local benchmarks into global outliers for a while. Now traders are rechecking everything, and stretched valuations in tech are not helping.

New data on Monday showed investment sliding again and retail sales growing at their slowest pace since Covid. Markets sold off hard on that. Housing added more problems as home prices resumed falling.

China Vanke’s deepening debt troubles added another layer to the real estate pressure. Trade tensions stayed in the background, making the macro picture even more unstable.

President Xi Jinping said he would crack down on “reckless” projects that only show surface-level results.His comments pointed to concerns about the quality of growth and how financial resources are used.

That message landed while tech stocks were already dealing with fear of an AI bubble. Xin-Yao Ng of Aberdeen Investments said the sector is reacting to “generally weak macro and lack of meaningful catalysts from the Central Economic Work Conference.”

Traders rotate out of tech as policy hopes fade

With the rally cooling, money began shifting away from high-priced tech names. Investors moved into areas that might gain from Beijing’s push to support domestic demand. That rotation helped onshore stocks hold up better. The CSI 300 lost 2.8% over the past month, while the HSCEI fell 6.8%.

The MSCI China gauge trades at roughly 12 times forward earnings, higher than its five-year average of 11. Some big global managers, including Amundi and Fidelity International, said China could still see gains next year thanks to its AI strength and its ability to stay steady during US tensions.

The MSCI China Index is still up almost 27% this year, beating regional peers and nearly doubling the S&P 500’s climb.

Even so, profit-taking hit popular names like Pop Mart, adding more pressure to domestic markets.

Marvin Chen of Bloomberg Intelligence said, “China stocks have lost momentum in the fourth quarter due to a lack of catalysts and underwhelming signals on policy support.”

He added that the market may keep taking cues from global sentiment until early next year, when key policy meetings begin.

Get $50 free to trade crypto when you sign up to Bybit now

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.004216
$0.004216$0.004216
+3.28%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
USDC Treasury mints 250 million new USDC on Solana

USDC Treasury mints 250 million new USDC on Solana

PANews reported on September 17 that according to Whale Alert , at 23:48 Beijing time, USDC Treasury minted 250 million new USDC (approximately US$250 million) on the Solana blockchain .
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:51
US S&P Global Manufacturing PMI declines to 51.8, Services PMI falls to 52.9 in December

US S&P Global Manufacturing PMI declines to 51.8, Services PMI falls to 52.9 in December

The post US S&P Global Manufacturing PMI declines to 51.8, Services PMI falls to 52.9 in December appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The business activity in
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 23:24