The post Airdrop season ends, and crypto is getting capital markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belongThe post Airdrop season ends, and crypto is getting capital markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong

Airdrop season ends, and crypto is getting capital markets

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

For the past several years, airdrops and point systems have been the lifeblood of crypto user acquisition. Crypto projects simply had no alternative. After the initial coin offering boom caused severe regulatory pushback, projects faced a difficult question: how do you get tokens into the hands of users without selling anything that might be construed as an unregistered security? Airdrops emerged as the answer.

Summary

  • Airdrops were a regulatory workaround, not a healthy market: They emerged after ICOs became legally toxic, but distorted incentives, rewarded extractive behavior, and undermined real product-market fit.
  • Regulated ICOs are returning, and resetting incentives: With clearer U.S. rules and platforms like Coinbase enabling compliant sales, projects can raise directly from users, restore price discovery, and reduce VC-driven distortions.
  • Crypto capital markets are maturing: Airdrops will shift to loyalty and governance rewards, while transparent fundraising and real investor skin-in-the-game replace the era of “free money.”

That era is ending. The shift in U.S. regulation has opened the door for compliant, transparent ICOs to return. We shouldn’t expect the same craze as in 2017 (the industry has matured enormously since then); on the contrary, the crypto sector will likely correct some of its distortions and develop more disciplined capital markets.

The return of ICOs

Coinbase’s announcement of a regulated ICO platform for U.S. investors was the clearest signal yet that the U.S. regulators are ready to re-engage with public token sales — that is, under structured, compliant conditions. Far from a nostalgic revival of the 2017 free-for-all, it’s a sign that ICOs, done properly, are no longer taboo.

The market responded immediately. MegaETH’s ICO was a blockbuster success, demonstrating that retail appetite for well-structured token offerings is still enormous. Plasma also drew huge demand back in June. Monad’s ICO took longer than expected to fill as Coinbase’s first ICO, but it still received a lot of attention from the industry. The ability to conduct public token sales again changes everything for crypto fundraising.

Why airdrops existed in the first place

After 2017, the ICO landscape became radioactive. Almost overnight, selling tokens to the public became legally risky, major exchanges refused to list tokens launched through public sales, and U.S. investors were effectively excluded from early-stage participation.

Yet developers still wanted to grow their networks, and users still wanted tokens. So crypto firms improvised a workaround in the form of airdrops. If tokens were given away rather than sold, perhaps they wouldn’t be treated as securities. It certainly seemed safer than the ICO model.

A new wrinkle was added to the scheme later on: points systems. Projects didn’t even need to really airdrop a token — instead, they could reward users with abstract “points” that hinted at future financial gains. These systems allowed projects to build hype and usage without crossing legal lines. It worked for a time, but it created distortions in the market.

The incentive problem

Since firms couldn’t raise from the public, they leaned heavily on venture capital. VCs obviously wanted liquidity events, so crypto projects were pressured into elaborate cycles of launching unfinished products, using points to attract “users,” and airdropping a token months later to satisfy investors.

The incentives were utterly broken: airdrop recipients (often times called “farmers”) had zero loyalty to the project they’d received tokens from; VCs didn’t care about product-market fit so much as token unlocks; protocol teams optimized for fake KPIs to justify valuations, and obtain exchange listings for day 1 selling liquidity; and real users were drowned out by extractive behavior.

Put differently, the project’s long-term success was irrelevant to VCs and airdrop recipients. It was all free money. Once you’d unlocked your liquidity — or received your airdrop — the best move was to sell your tokens and to move on to the next project. You couldn’t build anything of lasting value.

What this new ICO era unlocks

Regulated ICOs will give crypto a chance to fix those distortions and realign the sector’s economic foundation. This new wave will look nothing like 2017. Back then, ICOs only needed a whitepaper to get investors pouring in. Today, crypto market participants are far more educated, and regulators are setting clear boundaries. 

With the return of ICOs, crypto firms will no longer be forced to over-optimize for VC interests; they can raise directly from the people who believe in the product. Token holders will also become real stakeholders. Because they’ll have invested in the project, they will truly have skin in the game.

Markets will finally gain genuine price discovery. What the market is willing to pay for this or that new token becomes a real signal. Nor will crypto projects waste resources on convoluted airdrop campaigns anymore. That attention can be redirected towards product design and revenue.

Even so, as we’ve seen with Monad, ICOs don’t necessarily spell the end of token unlock schedules (which were a common feature in airdrops). Some projects will still experience significant selling pressure on their tokens over long time horizons.

In short, compliant public fundraising mechanics will abate some (but not all) of the major distortions that crypto capital markets have been suffering from. The ecosystem’s health is bound to improve.

Airdrops will have different functions

Airdrops and point systems were innovative in their own way, and they won’t fade away entirely. We should expect them to be used as part of loyalty programs — to reward investors who, for example, have participated in the protocol’s governance, or have already been holding the project’s token for a significant amount of time. 

The end of the airdrop season is a sign of maturation for crypto. The sector is finally building the infrastructure of real capital markets: regulated fundraising, transparent pricing, investor protections, and aligned incentives. Investors won’t get free money anymore, but they’ll be able to invest in crypto projects without having to worry as much about broken incentives.

Annabelle Huang

Annabelle Huang is the co-founder and chief executive officer of Altius Labs, a blockchain infrastructure company (backed by Founders Fund and Pantera) that focuses on solving execution performance bottlenecks.

Source: https://crypto.news/airdrop-season-ends-crypto-is-getting-capital-markets/

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.000399
$0.000399$0.000399
-2.25%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00