On-chain identity On-Chain Identity — ENS, Soulbound Tokens & Your Web3 Resume Your Ethereum address looks like: 0x8f3a...d91c Great for machinesOn-chain identity On-Chain Identity — ENS, Soulbound Tokens & Your Web3 Resume Your Ethereum address looks like: 0x8f3a...d91c Great for machines

On-Chain Identity — ENS, Soulbound Tokens & Your Web3 Resume

2026/01/03 16:17
7 min read

On-chain identity

On-Chain Identity — ENS, Soulbound Tokens & Your Web3 Resume

Your Ethereum address looks like:

0x8f3a...d91c

Great for machines, terrible for humans.

No founder wants to say “Send it to 0x8f3a…” in a pitch. No friend wants to triple-check every character when paying you back for coffee.

DAY 24 is about turning that ugly 0x into a name, profile, and reputation layer that actually feels human.

The problem: Wallets are usernames nobody can remember

Blockchains gave us ownership but forgot one thing: identity UX.

Right now:

  • Your address is your “username”
  • It’s long, random, and easy to mistype
  • It tells nothing about who you are or what you’ve done

Compare that to Web2:

  • Emails + usernames + profiles
  • LinkedIn-style resumes
  • Domain names instead of IP addresses

Web3 needs something similar, but user-owned and composable.

Enter ENS and Soulbound Tokens (SBTs).

ENS: Turning 0x addresses into names

ENS (Ethereum Name Service) is like DNS for Ethereum.

Instead of sending money to 0x8f3a...d91c, you send to ribhav.eth.

Under the hood, ENS does a simple job:

  • Maps human namesmachine addresses
  • Example: ribhav.eth → 0x8f3a...d91c

Why this matters:

  • Fewer “oops I sent to the wrong address” moments
  • More trust in payments and tips
  • Better branding for builders, DAOs, and projects

Think of ENS as:

  • Your crypto email (name.eth)
  • Your Web3 domain (can point to IPFS sites, profiles, etc.)
  • A starting point for your on-chain identity

One ENS name can store:

  • ETH address
  • BTC, SOL, LTC addresses
  • Website, Twitter, Telegram
  • Text records (bio, links to your portfolio)

So ribhav.eth can become a tiny, decentralized business card.

Soulbound Tokens: Badges that can’t be sold

ENS gives you a name.

Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) give you a reputation.

A Soulbound Token is:

  • A token that is non-transferable
  • Once minted to your wallet, it stays there
  • Used to represent credentials, achievements, memberships

You can think of them as:

  • On-chain diplomas
  • Attendance badges for events
  • DAO role or contributor badges
  • Reputation points you can’t buy on OpenSea

In a world where everything is tradable, SBTs are the things that prove who you are, not what you can flip.

Real protocol examples (identity in the wild)

These ideas aren’t just theory — there are live protocols already playing with on-chain identity.

ENS + social / DeFi apps

  • Many wallets, dApps, and even social platforms show your ENS (name.eth) instead of your 0x address.
  • Some dApps resolve ENS avatars and records directly into their UI, turning a bare address into a mini profile.

POAP (Proof of Attendance Protocol)

  • Events and hackathons give attendees POAP NFTs as digital badges proving you were actually there.
  • Some communities use POAP collections to unlock private channels, raffles, or governance perks.

Gitcoin Passport

  • Collect “stamps” from different identity sources (ENS, BrightID, Proof of Humanity, etc.) into one Sybil-resistance score.
  • Projects can check your Passport instead of doing KYC-style checks, to filter bots from real humans.

Lens / Farcaster social graphs

  • On Lens, your profile is an NFT; your follows, posts, and collects live on-chain.
  • Apps built on Lens or Farcaster can read the same social graph, meaning your identity travels with you instead of being locked in one app.

These are all early examples of identity + reputation as primitives, not just add-ons.

ENS + SBTs = A Web3-native resume

Put these together and you get something powerful.

Imagine:

  • ribhav.eth is your ENS name
  • Your wallet holds SBTs for:
  • “Completed 60 Days of Web3” badge
  • POAPs from hackathons and conferences
  • “Community Moderator” SBT from a protocol
  • “Audited Smart Contract Course” SBT

Now when someone looks up ribhav.eth, they don’t just see:

  • A random 0x and some ERC‑20s

They see:

  • A history of contributions
  • Proof that you actually did the things you claim

That’s a Web3 resume: machine-readable, verifiable, and composable.

Why this matters for builders

For devs and founders, on-chain identity solves real problems:

Better UX for users

  • Send money to alice.eth, not 0x1234…
  • Easier onboarding for non-crypto friends

Less Sybil/spam in communities

  • Require certain SBTs or Passport scores to join a gated Discord or governance channel.
  • Example: “Only wallets with ‘Hackathon Participant’ SBT can vote on this feature.”

Reputation-aware apps

  • Lending based on on-chain reputation instead of only collateral.
  • Airdrops targeting real contributors, not pure farmers.
  • DAOs rewarding long-term contributors, not “join today, dump tomorrow.”

For future DevRel work, this is huge:

  • You can design programs where contributions mint SBTs.
  • Your community doesn’t have to “trust your word” — they can check wallets.

Risks and open questions

On-chain identity sounds powerful, but it also opens a box of tricky questions.

Privacy vs permanence

  • Putting your achievements on-chain is cool; putting your entire life there might not be.
  • Once something is attached to your main wallet, it’s hard to hide later.

Doxxing and safety

  • If name.eth is clearly linked to your real identity, anyone can see your balances and history.
  • Builders need patterns like burner wallets, split identities, and selective disclosure.

Lost keys = lost identity

  • If your ENS and all your SBTs sit on one wallet and you lose that key, your “Web3 resume” is gone.
  • Social recovery, multi-sigs, and account abstraction will matter a lot here.

Who issues the badges?

  • If anyone can issue SBTs, spam and low-quality badges become a problem.
  • Reputation for issuers becomes as important as reputation for users.

We’re very early on standards, best practices, and culture here.

The future of on-chain identity

Some directions that feel almost inevitable:

Cross-chain identity

  • Today, ENS is mostly Ethereum. Tomorrow, we’ll see identities that work seamlessly across L2s, app-chains, and even non-EVM ecosystems.

Reputation-backed finance

  • Imagine undercollateralized DeFi loans where part of your credit score comes from SBTs and Passport-style stamps.
  • Your long-term participation and repayment history become on-chain signals.

Jobs and hiring

  • Instead of sending a static PDF, candidates could just share an ENS and a viewer link.
  • Recruiters filter for real contributions to open-source repos, DAOs, or protocols.

Social and gaming

  • Game achievements as SBTs, portable across titles.
  • Social feeds ranked not just on follower count, but on provable, earned reputation.

The big shift:

Identity stops being something platforms hold about you, and becomes something you carry with you into every app.

Reflection: From “just another NFT” to “this is my story”

At first, ENS felt like a vanity flex (vitalik.eth vibes) and SBTs sounded like a buzzword.

The shift happened when it clicked that:

  • ENS = your name on the door
  • SBTs = the certificates hanging inside the office

The address is still there in the background, but your identity becomes:

  • Easier to remember
  • Harder to fake
  • Richer than a list of tradeable JPEGs

As someone trying to break into DevRel and community roles, this changes how I think about credentials:

Instead of another PDF resume, imagine saying:

Key Takeaway

What to do next

If you’re learning:

  • Search your handle on ENS and see what’s free.
  • Sketch your ideal “SBT resume”: which skills, courses, and communities would you want as non-transferable badges?

If you’re building:

  • Ask: “What part of my product could benefit from identity or reputation?”
  • Could you issue SBTs or POAPs for early testers, contributors, or community mods?

Join the journey:

  • Share your ENS (or dream ENS) in the comments.
  • Tell us one SBT you wish existed for something you’ve done.
  • Jump into Web3ForHumans on Telegram and we’ll brainstorm Web3 resumes together.
  • Follow me on Medium | Twitter | Future

Further Reading

  • ENS — What is ENS?
    https://support.ens.domains/en/articles/7900404-what-is-ens
  • Ethereum Name Service (Beginner Guides)
    https://trustwallet.com/blog/guides/ethereum-name-service-beginners-guide
  • Soulbound Tokens (Concept & Use Cases)
    https://www.binance.com/en/academy/articles/what-are-soulbound-tokens-sbt
  • POAP — Proof of Attendance Protocol
    https://poap.xyz
  • Gitcoin Passport — Identity as a Public Good
    https://gitcoin.co/blog/intro-to-passport

On-Chain Identity — ENS, Soulbound Tokens & Your Web3 Resume was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Market Opportunity
ENS Logo
ENS Price(ENS)
$6.08
$6.08$6.08
+3.55%
USD
ENS (ENS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver has been taking a beating lately, and the Silver price hasn’t exactly been acting like a safe haven. After running up into the highs, the whole move reversed
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/07 03:15