TLDR Buterin says Ethereum needs fewer features and simpler code to remain decentralized. A “garbage collection” process is needed to remove outdated protocol componentsTLDR Buterin says Ethereum needs fewer features and simpler code to remain decentralized. A “garbage collection” process is needed to remove outdated protocol components

Vitalik Buterin Calls for Simpler Ethereum Code to Secure Decentralization

3 min read

TLDR

  • Buterin says Ethereum needs fewer features and simpler code to remain decentralized.
  • A “garbage collection” process is needed to remove outdated protocol components.
  • Ethereum’s switch to Proof-of-Stake is a model for future simplification steps.
  • Complex systems risk failing the walkaway test, says Vitalik Buterin.

Vitalik Buterin has called on Ethereum developers to simplify the network’s protocol to preserve decentralization and self-sovereignty. In a detailed post, he warned that growing complexity threatens Ethereum’s long-term resilience and may shift power to a small group of technical experts.

He explained that without a simpler design, Ethereum risks failing the “walkaway test”, the idea that the network should function even if its original builders step away. Buterin argued that the long-term sustainability of Ethereum depends on reducing technical complexity and maintaining trustless access for all.

Complexity Risks Ethereum’s Core Values

Buterin noted that even highly decentralized networks can fail key benchmarks like trustlessness and self-sovereignty if their code is too complex. He explained that complex systems require users to rely on a small group of experts to verify protocol behavior.

He wrote, “It’s not self-sovereign because if even the most technical people can’t inspect and understand the thing, it’s not fully yours.” He also warned that a bloated protocol makes it difficult for new development teams to maintain or improve the network.

Three Metrics to Guide Simplification

To support Ethereum’s long-term health, Buterin proposed three metrics for evaluating protocol design. The first is reducing total lines of code to make the system easier to maintain. The second is limiting dependency on advanced cryptography such as lattices or isogenies. The third is adding invariants, rules that simplify how the protocol behaves.

He cited EIP-6780 and EIP-7825 as examples that reduced code complexity by introducing technical limits that make client development easier. He also described the shift from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake as a “large-scale garbage collection” that removed inefficient legacy features.

Warning Against Excessive Feature Additions

Buterin expressed concern about the habit of adding too many features for niche use cases. He explained that each addition, while useful in isolation, can bloat the base protocol and increase long-term risk. “One of my fears with Ethereum protocol development is that we can be too eager to add new features,” he wrote. 

He urged a slower approach to changes and encouraged removing or isolating little-used components from the core system. He proposed that outdated features could be moved into smart contracts, allowing newer clients to operate without processing legacy code.

Moving Toward a More Sustainable Ethereum

As part of the roadmap, Buterin suggested switching from the EVM to a simpler virtual machine like RISC-V. He also recommended that older versions of Ethereum be run in separate containers, so new clients only support streamlined versions of the protocol.

He compared Ethereum’s development to the evolution of SpaceX rockets, where newer designs become more efficient over time. “An ideal protocol fits onto a single page, or at least a few pages,” Buterin stated.

He concluded by stating that Ethereum should move away from its “adolescence stage” of rapid experimentation. By focusing on simplicity, Buterin believes the network can remain decentralized and trustworthy for decades to come.

The post Vitalik Buterin Calls for Simpler Ethereum Code to Secure Decentralization appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

The purpose of collaboration is to advance the Web3 landscape by combining the decentralized infrastructure of TrendX with AI-led capabilities of Trusta AI.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07