The post PENGU tanks 16% as Man City gets dragged into Pudgy Penguins’ India backlash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Barely a week after the NFT project announcedThe post PENGU tanks 16% as Man City gets dragged into Pudgy Penguins’ India backlash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Barely a week after the NFT project announced

PENGU tanks 16% as Man City gets dragged into Pudgy Penguins’ India backlash

Barely a week after the NFT project announced its partnership with English football club Man City, the former UCL winner has been dragged into a social media uproar against a racial statement. 

Pudgy Penguins posted a message on X last week commenting on the social platform’s efforts to curb reply spam and so-called “AI slop” Information Finance posts. The post insinuated that the crackdown might “actually have a significant effect on India’s economy,” which many users interpreted as stereotyping Indians as the largest community in InfoFi.

Manchester City contacted Pudgy Penguins after the post circulated, asking the NFT platform to apologize to a community member who called it out as xenophobic. The Premier League club entered a commercial partnership with the NFT project last Thursday.

Manchester City forces Pudgy Penguins to apologize for mocking India

Dan Sickles, director of the NFT documentary project New Here, said Pudgy Penguins was “trafficking in base, xenophobic, colonial humor,” owing to how its American marketing team runs similar engagement farming campaigns like InfoFi. 

“I’ve met their guy, he’s great at his job, and he’s not from Mumbai,” Sickles said, referring to the project’s social media manager.

The backlash first began when an X user and Offline protocol developer named Satvik reported the post to Manchester City. Satvik said he took it up with the club after other users attempted to minimize the issue and deemed it harmless.

“Everyone commented on his post that it’s not serious and it wasn’t racism, let’s let the partners decide for themselves. I’m fucking tired of how normalized racism against Indians has become on this platform. Every single day we endure hurtful comments for simply existing online,” he complained.

Satvik later shared an email response he received from Manchester City, which read: 

According to the programmer, Pudgy Penguins’ CEO Lucas Netz should be “incredibly ashamed” of his team for allowing the post to be published. As of the time of writing, neither Netz nor the company had issued a public apology on their own channels.

Satvik later quoted his original post and said he wanted clarity on how Pudgy Penguins intended to prevent another xenophobic statement from being made. He wanted to hear what company policies Netz will enact “to prevent incidents like this from happening again, and for him to condemn xenophobia and racism more generally.”

“I’d also love to hear why the post stayed up so long despite people sharing feedback immediately,” he continued.

PENGU token drops 3.7% in 24 hours

The price of Pudgy Penguins’ token, PENGU, jumped by 5% after the project announced its partnership with Manchester City on January 15. But the rally proved short-lived as traders began taking profits soon after the announcement. 

PENGU has since fallen below $0.01, a drop of about 16% and a weekly plunge of 20%, coinciding with the community backlash over its now-deleted X post. Moreover, market participants believe that factors like the fading of the speculative interest after the partnership news was fully absorbed caused a negative price correction on the token.

According to its press statement, the Manchester City partnership debuted a premium digital collectible and merchandise for the football club’s fans. Yet, some netizens noted that Pudgy Penguins’ social media presence clashes with its family-friendly branding. 

While the brand markets itself through child-oriented products, its online posts frequently lean into trending topics in finance and technology, sometimes using edgy or provocative language to drive engagement, much similar to what InfoFi influencers and projects do. 

If you’re reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/man-city-dragged-into-pengu-backlash/

Market Opportunity
Manchester City Fan Logo
Manchester City Fan Price(CITY)
$0.5266
$0.5266$0.5266
+0.80%
USD
Manchester City Fan (CITY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00