Introduction Ripio, once a pure retail platform, has reoriented itself into a B2B infrastructure provider for Latin America’s crypto ecosystem. It has launched Introduction Ripio, once a pure retail platform, has reoriented itself into a B2B infrastructure provider for Latin America’s crypto ecosystem. It has launched

Ripio CEO Bets on Local Stablecoins Across Latin America

Ripio Ceo Bets On Local Stablecoins Across Latin America

Introduction

Ripio, once a pure retail platform, has reoriented itself into a B2B infrastructure provider for Latin America’s crypto ecosystem. It has launched its own dollar stablecoin and a family of local currency stablecoins, along with tokenized debt assets, aiming to integrate more of the local economy on-chain. CEO Sebastián Serrano expects 2026 to be a sideways year for crypto, but believes stablecoins could drive a decade of growth across the region.

Key Takeaways

  • Ripio pivots from consumer trading to B2B infrastructure, serving banks, fintechs, and large platforms such as Mercado Libre.
  • The firm issues its own dollar stablecoin Criptodólar (UXD) and a lineup of local fiat-backed stablecoins, including wARS, wBRL and wMXN, plus a tokenized AL30 bond.
  • Tokenizing local assets is framed as a pathway to reduce FX risk and bring more of the real economy on-chain, from debt to real estate.
  • The long-term thesis centers on a decade of stablecoins as local economies adopt on-chain rails and tokenized assets amid a challenging macro backdrop.

Tickers mentioned:

Tickers mentioned: $USDC, $USDT, $ETH

Sentiment

Sentiment: Neutral

Price impact

Price impact: Neutral. The moves described reflect strategic product expansion and regional adoption rather than immediate market-driven shifts in price.

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice)

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. The story centers on platform strategy and regional demand for stablecoins rather than short-term price catalysts.

Market context

Market context: The development occurs amid a broader shift toward local stablecoins and on-chain asset tokenization in emerging markets, where macro volatility and regulatory dynamics shape crypto adoption.

Rewritten article body

Ripio’s shift toward local currency stablecoins and tokenized government debt comes as CEO Sebastián Serrano predicts crypto in 2026 will be largely lateral, while stablecoins enter a multi-year expansion. Since its founding in 2013, the Argentine company has moved from a consumer exchange to a B2B infrastructure player, serving banks, fintechs, and large platforms such as Mercado Libre.

The firm now issues its own dollar stablecoin, Criptodólar (UXD), alongside a line of local fiat-backed stablecoins including the Argentine peso-pegged wARS, the Brazilian real-pegged wBRL, and the Mexican peso-pegged wMXN. It has also tokenized Argentina’s AL30 bond, a move Serrano says drew on-chain activity that Sunday after the October 2025 elections surpassed one million units.

“The most liquid assets, like sovereign debt, are going to be tokenized first,” he told our newsroom, adding that tokenizing the dollar was merely the first step toward bringing more of the real economy on-chain — from horses to real estate.

Fixing stablecoin UX

Ripio’s local stablecoins are live on the Ethereum mainnet, Base, and World Chain, with World App integrating most deeply so far. In its launch month December 2025, wARS recorded roughly $200,000 in transaction volume, and about $160,000 by January.

Serrano describes initial traction as promising, but notes the objective of achieving at least $100 million in assets under management by year-end.

This model of pairing local stablecoins with virtual local bank accounts is designed to fix what Serrano describes as a “crappy” user experience in non-custodial wallets, which often force users into clunky buy flows and incur immediate FX losses when converting into dollar-stablecoins.

By enabling one-to-one conversions from local currency into local stablecoins, Ripio aims to streamline onboarding and reduce upfront FX drag.

Local stablecoins for local debt

Longer term, Serrano sees local stablecoins as critical for decentralized finance lending in countries like Argentina and Brazil, where it makes little sense for locally salaried workers to borrow in US dollars. Most DeFi protocols, he notes, require borrowing in USDC or USDT, creating FX risk for borrowers whose income is in pesos or reais. “Most of the economy is denominated in the local currency,” he says, arguing that local stablecoins are the missing building block for a shift toward a locally oriented DeFi lending stack.

The decade belongs to stablecoins

Ripio’s strategy unfolds against a turbulent domestic backdrop. While Serrano credits President Javier Milei with macroeconomic improvements, he says his approach to crypto is constrained by regulatory localization and compliance costs. He references Coinbase’s recent decision to pause peso fiat rails as an example of how local operations can be challenged in a tightening regulatory environment.

Rather than trying to outpace every consumer app—from Binance on trading to Lemon’s Bitcoin-collateralized card—Serrano has leaned into a B2B role, positioning Ripio as the provider behind multiple platforms instead of a single retail app. He says the next decade belongs to stablecoins, arguing that on-chain asset tokenization will continue to grow and that stablecoins will anchor much of that expansion, with on-chain volumes reaching trillions in 2025 and beyond.

“It’s going to be the decade of stablecoins,” Serrano says, underscoring the emphasis on on-ramping local currencies and assets to the blockchain regardless of regulatory headwinds.

This article was originally published as Ripio CEO Bets on Local Stablecoins Across Latin America on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Yunfeng Financial appoints Jiang Guofei as Chairman of Web3 Development Committee

Yunfeng Financial appoints Jiang Guofei as Chairman of Web3 Development Committee

PANews reported on September 19th that the South China Morning Post reported that Jack Ma-backed Yunfeng Financial Group has appointed former Ant Group executive Geoff Jiang Guofei as Chairman of its Web3 Development Committee, further clarifying its strategic layout in the Web3 space. Jiang Guofei previously led Ant Group's blockchain project, Trusple , and served as Director of the DAMO Academy's Fintech Lab. Yunfeng recently completed its first real-world asset ( RWA ) tokenization project and purchased 10,000 Ethereum (ETH) for $ 44 million as a strategic reserve, with plans to promote tokenized solutions across multiple asset classes.
Share
PANews2025/09/19 18:01
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

The post XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple [XRP] remains one of the top five cryptocurrencies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:49