The post Crypto CLARITY Act Advances Amid Democratic Rift appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto CLARITY Act advances despite Democratic rift on presidentialThe post Crypto CLARITY Act Advances Amid Democratic Rift appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto CLARITY Act advances despite Democratic rift on presidential

Crypto CLARITY Act Advances Amid Democratic Rift

Crypto CLARITY Act advances despite Democratic rift on presidential crypto ban; bipartisan talks continue before committee markup.

The Crypto CLARITY Act is moving forward in the US Senate despite internal disagreements among Democrats.

Lawmakers continue negotiations as bipartisan efforts remain active. The debate now centers on ethics rules tied to presidential crypto involvement.

Bipartisan Talks Continue on Crypto Market Structure

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has expressed confidence in the progress of the Crypto CLARITY Act.

She stated that senators from both parties have worked together for months. These efforts focus on building a clear framework for digital asset regulation.

Gillibrand noted that two Senate committees are handling different parts of the bill. The Senate Agriculture Committee oversees commodity related crypto matters.

The Senate Banking Committee manages securities and banking oversight.

She explained that cryptocurrencies often fall between existing regulatory categories. This division allows both committees to review relevant areas.

Lawmakers believe this approach supports better coordination between regulators.

Committee Delays and Legislative Timeline

The Senate Agriculture Committee is scheduled to review the CLARITY Act on January 27.

The vote will focus on provisions under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. This step is part of the broader legislative process.

The Senate Banking Committee has postponed its markup hearing. It was initially planned for January 15. Reports suggest the hearing may move to late February or March.

Lawmakers also face uncertainty due to the approaching government shutdown deadline. These delays have slowed progress. However, negotiations continue behind closed doors.

Democratic Push for Presidential Crypto Restrictions

Ahead of the committee vote, Democrats introduced ethics-related amendments.

These proposals target potential conflicts involving senior government officials. The focus remains on presidential crypto activity.

Senator Michael Bennet introduced the Digital Asset Ethics Act. The amendment would restrict crypto involvement by the president and members of Congress.

Democrats argue this step is necessary for ethical clarity.

Republican leaders have acknowledged the disagreement. Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman stated, “Although it’s unfortunate that we couldn’t reach an agreement, I am grateful for the collaboration that has made this legislation better.”

The CLARITY Act still requires 60 Senate votes. Republicans will need Democratic support to move the bill forward.

Related Reading: CLARITY Act Enters Critical Phase Ahead of Senate Action January 27

Vote Threshold and Senate Outlook

The CLARITY Act requires 60 votes to pass the Senate. Republicans will need support from at least seven Democrats. This makes internal party agreement important.

Republican leaders have acknowledged the disagreement over ethics rules.

Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman stated, “Although it’s unfortunate that we couldn’t reach an agreement, I am grateful for the collaboration that has made this legislation better.”

Despite the rift, lawmakers continue negotiations. The bill remains active on the Senate calendar. Both parties are expected to revisit the issue as committee work progresses.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/crypto-clarity-act-gains-momentum-despite-democratic-rift-on-presidential-ban/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16