The Optimism token buyback vote has split opinions among the DAO’s delegates. Illustration: Hilary B; Source: ShutterstockThe Optimism token buyback vote has split opinions among the DAO’s delegates. Illustration: Hilary B; Source: Shutterstock

Delegates clash as Optimism token buyback proposal goes to a DAO vote

2026/01/23 23:31
4 min read

Optimism DAO delegates are heading to the polls as a landmark proposal to use a portion of Optimism’s revenue to buy back its OP governance token opened for voting on Thursday.

The proposal, if passed, will mandate the Optimism Foundation to use 50% of the revenue generated through the Superchain, a network of blockchains built using Optimism’s software, to buy OP tokens every month.

The vote has split opinions among the DAO’s delegates. While many support the proposal, others argue it’s a poor use of capital.

“Optimism is a net seller of OP (grants, payment-in-kind, etc) and it makes little sense to spend precious hard assets and shorten runway to buy back OP while still net selling,” PaperImperium, a governance liaison for GFX Labs, an Optimism DAO delegate, said on X.

Optimism is a major player in blockchain infrastructure. Its OP stack software framework is used by Coinbase’s Base blockchain, Uniswap’s Unichain, and Kraken’s Ink blockchain, among others.

But the project’s OP token hasn’t benefitted. It’s down more than 93% from its all-time high after hitting an all-time low of $0.25 last month.

The buyback proposal aims to change that. The more revenue Optimism makes, the more OP the nonprofit Optimism Foundation will be required to buy each month, potentially helping shore up the token’s price.

Such buyback programmes have become increasingly popular among crypto projects in recent months. But not everyone agrees that they’re worthwhile.

Researchers at crypto market maker Keyrock and market intelligence platform Messari argue buybacks can be a waste of money as they divert funds from marketing and growth initiatives and do little to impact token prices.

OTC issues

There are several more issues with the proposed buyback programme, according to delegates.

One is that the buybacks will be conducted over-the-counter instead of through the open market, meaning the purchases won’t directly impact market prices.

“A concerning scenario would be that employees or investors are using the OTC buybacks to offload their tokens as they unlock,” Michael Vander Meiden, an Optimism DAO delegate and member of the Optimism grants council, said in a forum post.

In response, the Optimism Foundation said it chose OTC execution as the simplest path to shipping the buyback programme. “All OTC trades will be reported publicly, either via stats.optimism.io or via the governance forum,” the foundation said in a forum post.

Still, not everyone is convinced.

“We would prefer to see more focus on crafting and publishing a business plan to get Optimism to financial sustainability,” GFX Labs said in a forum post. “That’s the real challenge that Optimism Foundation/Labs leadership needs to address, and a buyback does nothing to address this, and may in fact make it worse.”

Several other governance participants said they agree with GFX Labs’ criticisms.

‘A step in the right direction’

Despite the pushback, a large faction of Optimism’s DAO supports the buyback proposal.

“It’s totally fine to have a buyback programme alongside emissions, even if they technically cancel out (partially),” Milo Bowman, an Optimism DAO delegate, said in a forum post. “The meme of the buyback is important. It allows people to clearly project what would happen if the Superchain grows 100x.”

“It’s a step in the right direction,” a spokesperson for PGov, an Optimism DAO delegate, told DL News. “The specifics still need to be discussed and [we] would like to have more dialogue between the community and core teams foundation that propose it.”

The buyback vote will run for six days and ends on January 28.

So far, delegates have cast more than 3.8 million votes in favour of the proposal, with just over 19,000 votes against it.

Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at [email protected].

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Galaxy Digital’s 2025 Loss: SOL Bear Market

Galaxy Digital’s 2025 Loss: SOL Bear Market

The post Galaxy Digital’s 2025 Loss: SOL Bear Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Galaxy Digital, a digital assets and artificial intelligence infrastructure
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/04 09:49
FCA, crackdown on crypto

FCA, crackdown on crypto

The post FCA, crackdown on crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United Kingdom enters a decisive phase. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated a consultation to set minimum standards on transparency, consumer protection, and digital custody, in order to strengthen market confidence and ensure safer operations for exchanges, wallets, and crypto service providers. The consultation was published on May 2, 2025, and opened a public discussion on operational responsibilities and safeguarding requirements for digital assets (CoinDesk). The goal is to make the rules clearer without hindering the sector’s evolution. According to the data collected by our regulatory monitoring team, in the first weeks following the publication, the feedback received from professionals and operators focused mainly on custody, incident reporting, and insurance requirements. Industry analysts note that many responses require technical clarifications on multi-sig, asset segregation, and recovery protocols, as well as proposals to scale obligations based on the size of the operator. FCA Consultation: What’s on the Table The consultation document clarifies how to apply rules inspired by traditional finance to the crypto perimeter, balancing innovation, market integrity, and user protection. In this context, the goal is to introduce minimum standards for all firms under the supervision of the FCA, an essential step for a more transparent and secure sector, with measurable benefits for users. The proposed pillars Obligations towards consumers: assessment on the extension of the Consumer Duty – a requirement that mandates companies to provide “good outcomes” – to crypto services, with outcomes for users that are traceable and verifiable. Operational resilience: introduction of continuity requirements, incident response plans, and periodic testing to ensure the operational stability of platforms even in adverse scenarios. Financial Crime Prevention: strengthening AML/CFT measures through more stringent transaction monitoring and structured counterpart checks. Custody and safeguarding: definition of operational methods for the segregation of client assets, secure…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:40
HKMA Launches Fintech Blueprint with AI, DLT, Quantum and Cybersecurity Focus

HKMA Launches Fintech Blueprint with AI, DLT, Quantum and Cybersecurity Focus

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a Fintech Promotion Blueprint to support responsible innovation and fintech development in the banking sector.
Share
Fintechnews2026/02/04 10:20