Key Insights: XRP price is nearing a decisive phase as long-term technical levels return into focus. Chart analysts, cycle observers, and historical narratives Key Insights: XRP price is nearing a decisive phase as long-term technical levels return into focus. Chart analysts, cycle observers, and historical narratives

XRP Price Holds $1.60 as Cycle Models Signal Patience Before Expansion

4 min read

Key Insights:

  • XRP price is testing long-term structural support near the monthly 33 EMA.
  • Liquidity behavior implies positioning resets, not confirmed trend failure.
  • Cycle models involve focusing on consolidation in time before expansion.
  • Resurfaced historical emails add a psychological level to the existing market sentiment.

XRP price is nearing a decisive phase as long-term technical levels return into focus. Chart analysts, cycle observers, and historical narratives are converging on a similar time. The result is a market structure that promotes patience, liquidity behavior, and conviction.

XRP Price Tests Structural Support at Long-Term EMA Levels

XRP price is currently interacting with a long-observed confluence zone near the monthly 33 EMA. This is an area that has historically been a structural divide between consolidation and expansion phases. Recent candles show wicking of price into this zone as opposed to a clean break through.

According to EGRAG Crypto’s market commentary, such a trend is consistent with a classic liquidity test. He goes on to explain that the first touches of the 33 EMA often beckon stop hunts rather than immediate continuation. In this framework, XRP price holding near $1.60 represents structural defense, not weakness. The analyst pointed to the fact that closing strength is more important than intramonth volatility at this point.

XRPUSD Monthly Chart | Source: EGRAG, XXRPUSD Monthly Chart | Source: EGRAG, X

EGRAG Crypto also noted that the liquidity got swept to over $1.64 before the price stabilized. This sweep implies that leveraged positioning was cleared without hurting the general trend. From this point of view, XRP price is still inside a rising macro channel and not a breakdown. The structure-first approach holds that EMAs only confirm trends after reactions occur.

Liquidity Grabs and Expansion Paths

In addition, current chart projections showed two prominent structural paths for XRP price. The first path assumes a relief bounce followed by a secondary liquidity sweep. This second test would aim towards the $1.37 region before any larger expansion attempt.

EGRAG Crypto called this a “double liquidity grab” structure. He suggested markets often need a second flush to confirm real demand. Such moves tend to frustrate both bulls and bears before the direction is clear. In this scenario, XRP price is range-bound with internal pressure building.

XRPUSD Monthly Chart | Source: EGRAG, XXRPUSD Monthly Chart | Source: EGRAG, X

The other possible path implies direct expansion without going back to lower support. This scenario is based on historical fractals observed during previous XRP market cycles. Past cycles went straight from EMA contact to aggressive upside momentum. Using those comparisons, expansion projections extend out to $7 and even $27 zones.

Importantly, these levels are not presented as immediate targets. They are theoretical endpoints if the conditions for expansion are met. XRP price must first regain intermediate levels, particularly the $2.40 threshold. Failure to reach above that zone would delay any sustained trend continuation.

Cycle-Based Models Suggest Extended Consolidation

Beyond EMA analysis, cycle-focused traders drew similarities across historical bases of XRP.

Long periods of little volatility have preceded sharp repricing events in past cycles. These phases often turned out to be several years and then resolved upwards.

XRPUSD Weekly Chart | Source: BRUH, XXRPUSD Weekly Chart | Source: BRUH, X

Market commentators on TradingView indicated repeated base structures from 2017 and 2021. They believe XRP price is still early in its cycle range. Some models put the expansion of meaningful until late 2027 or 2028. This outlook focuses on time rather than immediate expectations of direction.

One popular chart focuses on extended sideways action after volatility spikes. In that model, price moves in tight bands before taking off suddenly vertically. Supporters of this view emphasized that accumulation phases are characterized by boredom, not fear. They also caution against overreacting to short-term swings within larger structures.

Historical Rivalries Reframe Market Psychology Around XRP Price

Meanwhile, a separate narrative layer came after resurfaced documents from the early history of crypto. Leaked 2014 emails showed intense tribalism among early bitcoin investors. These communications presented XRP and Stellar proponents as competitive threats.

The email chain, subsequently analyzed by Ripple’s CTO emeritus, David Schwartz, described investor pressure. Entrepreneur Austin Hill encouraged leading investors to pull their support of Jed McCaleb-linked projects. Recipients included Reid Hoffman, Joichi Ito, and Jeffrey Epstein. The message was crafted as an ultimatum: “pick one side or the other” when it comes to investing.

Source: David Schwartz, XSource: David Schwartz, X

According to the community researcher Leonidas Hadjilozou, this strategy was part of early ecosystem politics. Access to high-profile ventures such as Blockstream was seen as a conditional privilege. Endorsing Ripple or Stellar might have meant being excluded from other strategic opportunities.

XRP price approaches a critical EMA support as liquidity grabs, cycle models, and market psychology shape the next major move.

The post XRP Price Holds $1.60 as Cycle Models Signal Patience Before Expansion appeared first on The Market Periodical.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05