Friedrike Ernst co-founded Gnosis in 2015 when crypto was still very "weird." Illustration: Gwen P; Source: Shutterstock, Dr. Friederike ErnstFriedrike Ernst co-founded Gnosis in 2015 when crypto was still very "weird." Illustration: Gwen P; Source: Shutterstock, Dr. Friederike Ernst

Crypto’s no longer weird — and that’s a problem, says Gnosis co-founder

2026/02/03 16:19
3 min read

A version of this story appeared in The Guidance newsletter on February 2. Sign up here.

Hey all, Liam here.

For many, US President Donald Trump has been hugely beneficial to the crypto industry.

He’s issued several crypto-friendly executive orders, stacked the Securities and Exchange Commission with a handful of pro-business commissioners, and signed landmark stablecoin legislation into law.

Equally, these developments have inspired large banks and fintech companies to expand into the space, like never before.

Still, suggests Friederike Ernst, a co-founder of Gnosis, the regulatory wins and merging with traditional financial institutions belie the technology’s true potential.

Gnosis built and designed the Ethereum-based sidechain, Gnosis Chain; developed the multi-signature crypto wallet, Safe; and deployed a crypto payments network, Gnosis Pay.

“Why a lot of us got into [crypto] in the first place was not a back-end upgrade for existing industries,” she told DL News.

“It was a paradigm shift of how platforms, money and technology can work with the people, not against the people, how things that you do on a daily basis don’t leave you open to extraction from the powers that be.”

After several years under an aggressive — even hostile — SEC, complaining about the current administration’s approach to crypto is almost heretical.

Ernst is also of the camp that many in American politics, notably the Democratic Party, went too far in vilifying the industry.

“I don’t think anyone is above that or should be above the law,” she said. “But the extent to which crypto was vilified was pretty insulting. It’s difficult not to take that personally.”

But Ernst suggests that in this new era, the industry faces a very different kind of risk.

When she, Martin Köppelmann, and Stefan George founded Gnosis in 2015, the crypto industry was still very “weird.”

“Until recently, we were the weirdest from a societal point of view,” she said. “We were the magic internet money people who asked, ‘What is money?’ and ‘What makes money, money?’”

Most importantly, these questions also reconsidered the power structure ingrained in much of our financial system and advocated for new systems that promoted sovereignty, shared ownership, and individual agency, Ernst said.

In the last ten years, however, that’s all changed.

Robinhood will soon launch blockchain-based stocks, and Bank of America is now hiring a stablecoin engineer.

David Sachs, Trump’s crypto and artificial intelligence czar, declared at Davos this year that the banking industry and crypto industry will become “one digital assets industry.”

It is, in many ways, what many have been hoping for.

Not Ernst.

“I got into this for the agency and the ownership,” she said.

“If you now look at Robinhood and Bank of America, are these values there? I would argue that they’re not.”

Liam Kelly is DL News’ Berlin-based DeFi correspondent. Have a tip? Get in touch at [email protected].

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05