The post Is BTC Repeating Its 2020 Playbook—or Heading for One More Flush? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s sharp late-January sell-off has intensifiedThe post Is BTC Repeating Its 2020 Playbook—or Heading for One More Flush? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s sharp late-January sell-off has intensified

Is BTC Repeating Its 2020 Playbook—or Heading for One More Flush?

3 min read

Bitcoin’s sharp late-January sell-off has intensified debate over whether the market is approaching a cyclical bottom—or merely entering the next leg lower.

According to Galaxy Digital’s head of research, Alex Thorn, recent price action suggests downside risks remain elevated, with Bitcoin potentially drifting toward long-term technical support levels in the weeks or months ahead.

Sponsored

Galaxy Digital Warns Bitcoin Could Drift Toward Long-Term Support Near $58,000

In a research note sent to Galaxy clients, Thorn said the Bitcoin price is likely to drift lower, towards $70,000, then potentially down to the 200w MA (approximately $60,000) over the next weeks or months.

Bitcoin fell roughly 15% between January 28 and January 31, with a 10% drop on Saturday alone triggering more than $2 billion in long liquidations across derivatives venues. Notably, this was one of the largest liquidation events on record.

Bitcoin (BTC) Price Performance. Source: TradingView

Prices briefly slipped as low as $75,644 on the Coinbase exchange, pushing Bitcoin nearly 10% below the average cost basis of US spot Bitcoin ETFs, estimated at around $84,000.

At one point, BTC also dipped below Strategy’s average purchase price near $76,000 and approached its April 2025 “Tariff Tantrum” low.

Sponsored

The drawdown has left a growing share of investors underwater. Thorn noted that roughly 46% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply is now held at a loss, a level historically associated with late-stage bear markets.

On-chain data also reveals a thin ownership zone between $70,000 and $80,000, an area Thorn says could increase the likelihood of further downside as demand is tested.

He added that the realized price, currently near $56,000, and the 200-week moving average around $58,000 have historically converged near cycle bottoms.

Bitcoin (BTC) Price Performance. Source: TradingView

Sponsored

Bitcoin’s Macro Narrative Weakens as Gold Leads, but Rotation Hopes Emerge

Macro dynamics are also weighing on sentiment. Bitcoin has failed to rally alongside gold and silver amid heightened geopolitical and economic uncertainty. This undermines its narrative as a debasement hedge.

As commodities attracted safe-haven flows, Bitcoin instead lagged, an unusual divergence that Thorn says has “worked against” the asset’s narrative.

Still, not all signals point decisively lower. While whale accumulation remains muted, long-term holder profit-taking, which averaged roughly $500 million per day through 2025, has begun to abate. Historically, a slowdown in long-term holder selling has coincided with market bottoms.

Bitcoin Long-Term Holder Realized Profit. Source: Alex Thorne on X

Sponsored

Meanwhile, some market watchers see potential parallels with 2020. Bull Theory pointed to August of that year, when gold topped before capital rotated into risk assets, fueling Bitcoin’s explosive rally into 2021.

With the ISM index again above 50, signaling economic expansion, and gold recently pulling back sharply, the firm argued that “we could now see a rotation into risk-on assets over the coming months.”

While Galaxy Digital sees limited evidence of a definitive bottom, the firm argues that if Bitcoin revisits its realized price or 200-week moving average, those levels could once again act as a long-term safety net—just as they have in past cycles.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-downside-risk-galaxy-digital-warning/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05