Global executive survey finds AI momentum is real—but leadership alignment, capability gaps, and ROI clarity are slowing enterprise impact PALO ALTO, Calif.–(BUSINESSGlobal executive survey finds AI momentum is real—but leadership alignment, capability gaps, and ROI clarity are slowing enterprise impact PALO ALTO, Calif.–(BUSINESS

HTEC Research Reveals the Real AI Scaling Challenge: It’s Not the Technology

5 min read

Global executive survey finds AI momentum is real—but leadership alignment, capability gaps, and ROI clarity are slowing enterprise impact

PALO ALTO, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#engineering–AI has moved from ambition to action. Every organization is deploying it. Yet for most enterprises, the real challenge is only just beginning.

Today, HTEC, a global AI‑first provider of software and hardware design and engineering services, released Executive Summary: A Cross‑Industry View of the State of AI in 2025, a global research report that captures how senior executives are navigating the next phase of AI transformation—and why scaling value remains elusive.

Based on insights from 1,529 C‑suite executives worldwide, the research offers one of the most comprehensive leadership perspectives to date on where AI is delivering impact, where it is stalling, and what separates experimentation from enterprise‑wide advantage.

AI Is Everywhere—But Rarely Fully Embedded

The data reveals a clear inflection point. AI adoption is now universal: 100% of organizations report active AI deployment. But scale remains the exception, not the rule.

Only 45% of executives say AI is fully embedded across multiple functions or products. The majority report fragmented deployments—AI running in pockets, pilots, or isolated initiatives rather than as a coordinated operating model.

For HTEC, this mirrors what clients experience on the ground. The challenge is no longer proving AI works. It is turning promising use cases into integrated systems and workflows that deliver measurable, repeatable ROI.

Where AI Momentum Breaks Down

Executives are remarkably aligned on why progress slows.

The first fracture point isn’t model performance—it’s integration.
The most frequently cited barrier is the difficulty of embedding AI into existing processes and legacy systems (43%). This is where initiatives stall, ownership fragments, and value erodes.

Internal capability gaps make “build everything in‑house” unrealistic.
As AI moves deeper into core operations, leaders acknowledge that shortages in critical technical skills create execution bottlenecks that compound over time.

Unclear prioritization and ROI force a shift in execution strategy.
With limited internal capacity and AI literacy to evaluate and scale multiple initiatives in parallel, executives increasingly plan to rely on specialized partners and third‑party platforms to accelerate deployment, reduce risk, and focus internal teams where they create the most value.

The message is consistent across industries: AI success is now constrained by organizational readiness, not algorithmic potential.

Edge AI Moves From Experimental to Essential

The research also highlights a decisive shift in how leaders view edge and embedded AI.

Edge AI is no longer seen as optional or experimental. Ninety‑two percent of executives report strong familiarity with edge capabilities and express confidence in deploying AI closer to where data is generated, and decisions are made—particularly to improve security, resilience, regulatory control, and performance in constrained environments.

At the same time, leaders are pragmatic about what it takes to scale. Most plan a blended approach: combining specialized partners, third‑party platforms, and selective in‑house development. The goal is speed without sacrificing control—and long‑term ownership without slowing execution.

The Cost of Inaction Is Measured in Years

Executives are acutely aware of the stakes. They estimate that failing to act on AI and edge opportunities could set their organizations back by nearly two years.

In response, most leaders are targeting one‑ to three‑year horizons to validate use cases, deploy enterprise roadmaps, upskill their workforce, and launch new AI‑enabled revenue streams.

Yet confidence remains fragile. Only 25% of executives believe their organization can adopt and scale AI rapidly. Another 22% expect selective adoption with slower scaling. Thirty‑one percent say they can experiment but struggle to capture value, while 22% admit they are already falling behind.

Taken together, the findings suggest a sobering reality: three in four organizations risk turning AI momentum into missed advantage unless they address structural, operational, and leadership barriers.

From Projects to Operating Model

“The next phase of AI is not about more pilots,” said Lawrence Whittle, Chief Strategy Officer at HTEC. “It’s about defining bold ambitions, redesigning end‑to‑end processes, and scaling AI through modular, enterprise‑wide roadmaps. Organizations that succeed will be those that treat AI as a core operating model—not a collection of projects.”

To explore the full findings and executive insights from the report, download Executive Summary: A Cross-Industry View of the State of AI in 2025.

About the Report

The report was commissioned by HTEC and conducted by Censuswide. It includes the insights from 1,529 C-suite leaders across the USA, UK, Germany, Spain, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, spanning CEOs, CIOs, CTOs, CDOs, CFOs, COOs, CPOs, and CSOs across industries, including financial services, healthcare, automotive, telecommunications, retail, and semiconductors.

About HTEC

HTEC Group Inc. is a global AI-first provider of strategic, software and hardware embedded design and engineering services, specializing in Advanced Technologies, Financial Services, MedTech, Automotive, Telco, and Enterprise Software & Platforms. HTEC has a proven track record of helping Fortune 500 and hyper-growth companies solve complex engineering challenges, drive efficiency, reduce risks, and accelerate time to market. HTEC prides itself on attracting top talent and has strategically chosen the locations of its 20+ excellence centers to enable this.

Contacts

Media Contact:
[email protected]

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05