The post X tightens API on fee pools as Smart Cashtags near launch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X API policy update blocks non-consensual fee pools cryptoThe post X tightens API on fee pools as Smart Cashtags near launch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X API policy update blocks non-consensual fee pools crypto

X tightens API on fee pools as Smart Cashtags near launch

X API policy update blocks non-consensual fee pools

crypto-trading-under-sec-finra-rules/”>x plans to update its API policy to block applications from creating fee pools without user consent. The change targets patterns where third-party apps assign pooled fees to users absent an explicit, opt-in authorization.

In practice, the update focuses on affirmative, informed consent rather than implied or retroactive enrollment. It is intended to reduce confusion over money-like mechanics embedded in engagement or discovery tools.

The move signals a tightening around financialized interactions that touch user accounts or incentives. It also sets clearer boundaries for developers experimenting with InfoFi models on the platform.

Why banning fee pools without user consent matters

Requiring explicit consent mitigates the risk of unauthorized value flows and opaque incentives attached to social activity. It also clarifies user intent, improving auditability and reducing disputes about how fees are allocated.

Consent-first design can curb spam-like patterns in incentive programs that pay or credit users to post. It provides a clearer record of what a user enabled, when they enabled it, and how to reverse it.

On-the-record confirmation underscores the shift: “X is updating its API rules to block third-party apps that assign fee pools to users without their consent,” said Nikita Bier, Product Lead at X.

Bier’s public comments have criticized justifications for non-consensual fee pools as likely to provoke predictable backlash once users notice the mechanics. The message elevates transparency and forewarns developers relying on implied models.

The consent-first shift comes alongside usage-based API pricing and xAI credits. This combination reflects a broader push for financial control and transparency, according to AInvest.

BingX: a trusted exchange delivering real advantages for traders at every level.

Developers integrating financialized engagement will need explicit opt-in flows, in-UI disclosures, and revocation paths before any fee pool is assigned. Recording consent and honoring withdrawal will be essential for compliance reviews.

Smart Cashtags are expected to launch within weeks, enabling in-feed trading of crypto and stocks and displaying live prices and charts, as reported by Cardano Feed. The experience ties asset discussion more directly to market utilities on X.

Together, the policy and Smart Cashtags raise the bar for transparency around monetized interactions. Apps built atop asset discovery or conversation may face closer scrutiny of incentives, consent records, and spam-resilience.

At the time of this writing, broader markets showed mixed signals, with gold near US$5,000 and GC=F +1.98%, while HALO +3.28% and XLV +1.07%, based on data from Yahoo Finance. Feeds were flagged as delayed.

Enforcement and developer compliance on X

Recent enforcement examples: Kaito, Cookie DAO, and InfoFi behaviors

As reported by Yellow.com, X revoked API access for InfoFi apps including Kaito and Cookie DAO after behaviors characterized as spam and abuse, including token rewards for posting and fee‑pool‑like arrangements. The actions illustrate how incentives that degrade conversation quality or obscure financial mechanics can trigger enforcement.

The pattern points to access suspension as a likely remedy when apps automate value flows without consent. Developers should assume intensified review where user replies, mentions, or tags appear coupled with synthetic financial incentives.

Developer compliance checklist for explicit user consent

  • Present a clear opt-in describing the fee pool’s purpose, scope, parties, and data use.
  • Capture affirmative consent; prohibit pre-checked boxes or passive enrollment.
  • Log consent with timestamps, user identifiers, and versioned terms.
  • Provide an in-product receipt summarizing what was enabled and how to disable it.
  • Offer easy opt-out; honor revocation promptly and cease allocations.
  • Disclose how fees are calculated, pooled, distributed, and any third-party roles.
  • Prevent enrollment from replies/mentions or auto-tagging without a dedicated opt-in.
  • Monitor incentives to avoid spam-like posting rewards and label any promotions.
  • Maintain audit trails for X policy reviews and potential appeals.
  • Pause fee-pool actions if API access is rate-limited, restricted, or revoked.

FAQ about X API policy update

How will the Smart Cashtags feature work and when is it expected to launch?

It will show real-time prices and charts and enable in-feed orders; launch timing is described as “within weeks” in prior public statements, with no firm date announced.

Which types of third-party apps are most likely to be affected by the new policy (e.g., InfoFi, token-reward platforms)?

InfoFi platforms, token-reward apps, and tools that auto-assign fee pools without explicit opt-in are most exposed; compliant apps using clear consent flows face lower risk.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/x-tightens-api-on-fee-pools-as-smart-cashtags-near-launch/

Market Opportunity
NEAR Logo
NEAR Price(NEAR)
$1.0549
$1.0549$1.0549
-0.31%
USD
NEAR (NEAR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
MAXI DOGE Holders Diversify into $GGs for Fast-Growth 2025 Crypto Presale Opportunities

MAXI DOGE Holders Diversify into $GGs for Fast-Growth 2025 Crypto Presale Opportunities

Presale crypto tokens have become some of the most active areas in Web3, offering early access to projects that blend culture, finance, and technology. Investors are constantly searching for the best crypto presale to buy right now, comparing new token presales across different niches. MAXI DOGE has gained attention for its meme-driven energy, but early [...] The post MAXI DOGE Holders Diversify into $GGs for Fast-Growth 2025 Crypto Presale Opportunities appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/18 00:00
DeAgentAI releases new white paper, detailing $AIA token economics and staking model

DeAgentAI releases new white paper, detailing $AIA token economics and staking model

PANews reported on September 18 that the Sui ecological AI project DeAgentAI announced that it has updated its official white paper to version V2. The new white paper primarily adds "token economics" and "staking mechanisms." The token economics section details $AIA's core functions, value capture model, token distribution ratio, and detailed release rules. The staking mechanism section explains $AIA's value and how to stake it. In addition, the white paper also published security audit reports issued by multiple institutions on core components such as token contracts and cross-chain bridges.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 12:05