Crypto funds lose $3.74B in four weeks as U.S. outflows drive continued institutional caution. Crypto investment products from BlackRock, Fidelity, and Bitwise Crypto funds lose $3.74B in four weeks as U.S. outflows drive continued institutional caution. Crypto investment products from BlackRock, Fidelity, and Bitwise

Selling Pressure Persists in Crypto Funds, CoinShares Reports

2026/02/17 07:59
3 min read

Crypto funds lose $3.74B in four weeks as U.S. outflows drive continued institutional caution.

Crypto investment products from BlackRock, Fidelity, and Bitwise have now recorded four straight weeks of outflows. Data from CoinShares shows that investors pulled out $173 million last week, bringing total withdrawals over the past month to $3.74 billion.

Crypto Funds Shed Billions as Market Sentiment Remains Fragile

Institutional investors are reducing their exposure to digital asset funds. As per recent data, money continues to flow out of major crypto investment products. Weekly withdrawals have slowed, but funds are still leaving the market. Investors remain cautious as price swings and economic signals influence their decisions.

Crypto investment products from BlackRock, Fidelity, and Bitwise recorded a fourth straight week of outflows. According to CoinShares, investors withdrew $173 million last week. Total outflows over the past four weeks reached $3.74 billion.

Redemptions have slowed compared to earlier in the month. Weekly outflows previously peaked at $1.7 billion and stood at $187 million the week before. Even so, selling pressure has not reversed. James Butterfill, head of research at CoinShares, said data points to a continued pullback rather than a recovery.

Assets under management have dropped sharply, with total holdings across crypto exchange-traded products now at $87.04 billion. In late January, that figure was close to $115 billion.

Notably, this decline of more than $28 billion reflects both lower prices and steady withdrawals. Investor redemptions have added pressure to the market rather than simply tracking the price drop.

Meanwhile, trading activity has slowed, with weekly volumes falling to $27 billion from a record $63 billion. Lower trading levels suggest less speculative activity. As a result, investors appear to be moving away from aggressive bets and focusing more on protecting capital.

Daily flow data shows sharp swings in investor behavior. February 2 posted inflows of $561.9 million. Heavy outflows followed, with $544.9 million leaving on February 4 and $434.1 million on February 5. 

U.S. Drives $403M Outflows While Overseas Markets Post Gains

Butterfill noted that early-week inflows of $575 million quickly reversed into $853 million in outflows. Slight improvement appeared Friday after softer-than-expected CPI data, bringing $105 million in inflows. Activity points to macro-driven decisions rather than steady accumulation.

Image Source: CoinShares

Regional data shows different investor behavior across markets. In the United States, funds recorded $403 million in weekly outflows. Meanwhile, overseas markets saw combined inflows of $230 million. 

Germany led with $115 million, followed by Canada at $46.3 million and Switzerland at $36.8 million. As a result, capital appears to be moving outside the U.S. while American investors cut their exposure.

Image Source: SoSoValue

Bitcoin products carried most of the pressure, losing $133 million. Short-bitcoin products also recorded $15.4 million in outflows over two weeks. Such patterns often appear when traders close positions on both sides of the market. Ethereum funds lost $85.1 million, while smaller products, including Hyperliquid, shed $1 million.

Four weeks of redemptions signal caution among institutional investors. Slower outflows offer some relief, yet conviction remains fragile. Until flows stabilize, defensive positioning may continue to dominate crypto fund markets.

The post Selling Pressure Persists in Crypto Funds, CoinShares Reports appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.001204
$0.001204$0.001204
-0.82%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Yunfeng Financial appoints Jiang Guofei as Chairman of Web3 Development Committee

Yunfeng Financial appoints Jiang Guofei as Chairman of Web3 Development Committee

PANews reported on September 19th that the South China Morning Post reported that Jack Ma-backed Yunfeng Financial Group has appointed former Ant Group executive Geoff Jiang Guofei as Chairman of its Web3 Development Committee, further clarifying its strategic layout in the Web3 space. Jiang Guofei previously led Ant Group's blockchain project, Trusple , and served as Director of the DAMO Academy's Fintech Lab. Yunfeng recently completed its first real-world asset ( RWA ) tokenization project and purchased 10,000 Ethereum (ETH) for $ 44 million as a strategic reserve, with plans to promote tokenized solutions across multiple asset classes.
Share
PANews2025/09/19 18:01
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

The post XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple [XRP] remains one of the top five cryptocurrencies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:49