The post What Is Happening With And To The New York Mets? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OMG is right, but so too is LOL. Brandon Nimmo (holding the sign)The post What Is Happening With And To The New York Mets? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OMG is right, but so too is LOL. Brandon Nimmo (holding the sign)

What Is Happening With And To The New York Mets?

2025/12/12 04:30

OMG is right, but so too is LOL. Brandon Nimmo (holding the sign) is no longer a Met, neither is Edwin Díaz or Pete Alonso. David Stearns has a lot of work to do. (Photo by Justin Berl/Getty Images)

Getty Images

What has happened to the New York Mets? In a matter of weeks, the team that contended over the past few seasons has been stripped down, and the club that takes the diamond next season won’t look very much like the ones that previously played in Queens. And whether or not the new formulation is successful, the fans are none too pleased.

Goodbye Brandon Nimmo

In November, in what is commonly-referred to as a “challenge trade,” the Mets swapped their longest-tenured player, outfielder Brandon Nimmo, to the Texas Rangers in return for second baseman Marcus Semien. The deal saves New York some money in the long run, as they rid themselves of the five years and $101.25 million left on Nimmo’s eight-year deal he signed in 2023. Semien is owed just $72 million over the final three years of the seven-year, $175 million contract he signed with Texas in December 2021. The Mets also threw in an additional $5 million to offset the difference.

David Stearns, New York’s president of baseball operations, went into the off-season looking to improve the team’s defense. And although he has multiple prospects ready to play second base, he felt the move for Semien – at the cost of Nimmo – was the right choice. After the deal he was quoted as saying losing a fan-favorite like Nimmo “was something we had to think about, no question. That certainly makes decisions like this a little bit more challenging than they otherwise would be. But at the end of the day, I still felt like this was the right decision for the organization.”

Goodbye Edwin Díaz

On Tuesday, the back-to-back World Series champion Los Angeles Dodgers signed closer Edwin Díaz to a three-year, $69 million contract, which, on its face, is three million more than the Mets offered their former closer. However, according to Joel Sherman of the New York Post, the deal includes deferrals of $4.5 million per season, taking the deal down to $21.1 million per season for luxury tax purposes. Could the Mets, under the auspices of the richest owner in baseball, have managed to dig up another $3 million (and less than that on a pure cash flow basis) to keep Timmy Trumpets playing in CitiField for the next three seasons? That seems reasonable. Which raises maybe a larger question: Why didn’t Díaz give them a chance to match the offer? What does it say about the organization that he wanted to head west?

Goodbye Pete Alonso

On Wednesday, Pete Alonso, the team’s all-time home run leader with 264, departed to Baltimore on a 5-year, $155 million contract. The Mets, apparently, were not willing to go beyond three years for the slugger, so didn’t even bother to make an offer. Considering that the day before Alonso signed with the Orioles, fellow slugger Kyle Schwarber re-signed with the Phillies for five years and $150 million, and that he is two years older than the “Polar Bear,” and doesn’t play a defensive position, it is either shocking that the Mets let a franchise player go, or surprising that Philadelphia was willing to roll the dice so substantially. The former is a better analysis.

With Alonso out of the lineup and out of the clubhouse, New York loses the heart and soul of the club, the leader of the “LFGM” brigade, who never found a moment when he couldn’t or wouldn’t rip off his jersey and celebrate with his teammates. There was a real chance that he could have retired as a Met, and if he collected another 236 homers, potentially been the third player (after Tom Seaver and Mike Piazza) to enter the Hall of Fame with a Mets logo on his cap.

There Is Still Time

There are still two months before pitchers and catchers report, and Stearns still has a lot of wheeling and dealing to do. But that may not placate the fans. Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic wrote this morning: “The irrational Mets fan, the long-suffering type who suffered through the years of the Wilpon ownership, now must wonder if Fred and Jeff are practicing voodoo on Stearns and owner Steve Cohen.”

With all of the losses (and the addition of Semien and new closer Devin Williams), the team still has not addressed its biggest need: starting pitching. The team set an MLB record for pitchers used by one team in 2025, including 17 different starters. Framber Valdez, Ranger Suárez, and Tatsuya Imai are still available in the free agent market. Maybe the goodwill of acquiring Semien will help with the bad taste of losing Alonso, and uber-agent Scott Boras will direct Imai, the Japanese superstar, to Stearns and Cohen and help quiet the critics. Or, better yet, the team could reach deep into its prospects and some toss in some players on the major league roster, and pull off a blockbuster trade to bring two-time Cy Young winner Tarik Skubal to New York. Stranger things have happened.

The team could still sign Kyle Tucker and let him fill the void in left field caused by the loss of Nimmo. And/or they could add Cody Bellinger, and allow him to become the center fielder they have needed for years, or slot him at first base to fill the Alonso-sized hole on the right side of the infield.

This much is true: the addition of Williams as a Yankees cast-off is not going to move the needle if that is their only major move. As Rosenthal wrote: “The rational Mets fan knows it’s Dec. 10. The irrational Mets fan doesn’t want to hear it.”

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danfreedman/2025/12/11/what-is-happening-with-and-to-the-new-york-mets/

Piyasa Fırsatı
OmiseGo Logosu
OmiseGo Fiyatı(OMG)
$0,07954
$0,07954$0,07954
-%5,81
USD
OmiseGo (OMG) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Trump-Backed WLFI Plunges 58% – Buyback Plan Announced to Halt Freefall

Trump-Backed WLFI Plunges 58% – Buyback Plan Announced to Halt Freefall

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the Trump-linked DeFi project, is scrambling to stop a market collapse after its token lost over 50% of its value in September. On Friday, the project unveiled a full buyback-and-burn program, directing all treasury liquidity fees to absorb selling pressure. According to a governance post on X, the community approved the plan overwhelmingly, with WLFI pledging full transparency for every burn. The urgency of the move reflects WLFI’s steep losses in recent weeks. WLFI is trading Friday at $0.19, down from its September 1 peak of $0.46, according to CoinMarketCap, a 58% drop in less than a month. Weekly losses stand at 12.85%, with a 15.45% decline for the month. This isn’t the project’s first attempt at intervention. Just days after launch, WLFI burned 47 million tokens on September 3 to counter a 31% sell-off, sending the supply to a verified burn address. For World Liberty Financial, the buyback-and-burn program represents both a damage-control measure and a test of community faith. While tokenomics adjustments can provide short-term relief, the project will need to convince investors that WLFI has staying power beyond interventions. WLFI Launches Buyback-and-Burn Plan, Linking Token Scarcity to Platform Growth According to the governance proposal, WLFI will use fees generated from its protocol-owned liquidity (POL) pools on Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana to repurchase tokens from the open market. Once bought back, the tokens will be sent to a burn address, permanently removing them from circulation.WLFI Proposal Source: WLFI The project stressed that this system ties supply reduction directly to platform growth. As trading activity rises, more liquidity fees are generated, fueling larger buybacks and burns. This seeks to create a feedback loop where adoption drives scarcity, and scarcity strengthens token value. Importantly, the plan applies only to WLFI’s protocol-controlled liquidity pools. Community and third-party liquidity pools remain unaffected, ensuring the mechanism doesn’t interfere with external ecosystem contributions. In its proposal, the WLFI team argued that the strategy aligns long-term holders with the project’s future by systematically reducing supply and discouraging short-term speculation. Each burn increases the relative stake of committed investors, reinforcing confidence in WLFI’s tokenomics. To bolster credibility, WLFI has pledged full transparency: every buyback and burn will be verifiable on-chain and reported to the community in real time. WLFI Joins Hyperliquid, Jupiter, and Sky as Buyback Craze Spills Into Wall Street WLFI’s decision to adopt a full buyback-and-burn strategy places it among the most ambitious tokenomic models in crypto. While partly a response to its sharp September price decline, the move also reflects a trend of DeFi protocols leveraging revenue streams to cut supply, align incentives, and strengthen token value. Hyperliquid illustrates the model at scale. Nearly all of its platform fees are funneled into automated $HYPE buybacks via its Assistance Fund, creating sustained demand. By mid-2025, more than 20 million tokens had been repurchased, with nearly 30 million held by Q3, worth over $1.5 billion. This consistency both increased scarcity and cemented Hyperliquid’s dominance in decentralized derivatives. Other protocols have adopted variations. Jupiter directs half its fees into $JUP repurchases, locking tokens for three years. Raydium earmarks 12% of fees for $RAY buybacks, already removing 71 million tokens, roughly a quarter of the circulating supply. Burn-based models push further, as seen with Sky, which has spent $75 million since February 2025 to permanently erase $SKY tokens, boosting scarcity and governance influence. But the buyback phenomenon isn’t limited to DeFi. Increasingly, listed companies with crypto treasuries are adopting aggressive repurchase programs, sometimes to offset losses as their digital assets decline. According to a report, at least seven firms, ranging from gaming to biotech, have turned to buybacks, often funded by debt, to prop up falling stock prices. One of the latest is Thumzup Media, a digital advertising company with a growing Web3 footprint. On Thursday, it launched a $10 million share repurchase plan, extending its capital return strategy through 2026, after completing a $1 million program that saw 212,432 shares bought at an average of $4.71. DeFi Development Corp, the first public company built around a Solana-based treasury strategy, also recently expanded its buyback program to $100 million, up from $1 million, making it one of the largest stock repurchase initiatives in the digital asset sector. Together, these cases show how buybacks, whether in tokenomics or equities, are emerging as a key mechanism for stabilizing value and signaling confidence, even as motivations and execution vary widely
Paylaş
CryptoNews2025/09/26 19:12
Son of filmmaker Rob Reiner charged with homicide for death of his parents

Son of filmmaker Rob Reiner charged with homicide for death of his parents

FILE PHOTO: Rob Reiner, director of "The Princess Bride," arrives for a special 25th anniversary viewing of the film during the New York Film Festival in New York
Paylaş
Rappler2025/12/16 09:59
Bitcoin Peak Coming in 45 Days? BTC Price To Reach $150K

Bitcoin Peak Coming in 45 Days? BTC Price To Reach $150K

The post Bitcoin Peak Coming in 45 Days? BTC Price To Reach $150K appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Bitcoin has delivered one of its strongest performances in recent months, jumping from September lows of $108K to over $117K today. But while excitement is high, market watchers warn the clock is ticking.  History shows Bitcoin peaks don’t last forever, and analysts now believe the next major top could arrive within just 45 days, with …
Paylaş
CoinPedia2025/09/18 15:49